2, Mark in person presented the necessity of a canon, persuaded and appealed to camp 
leaders and finally got an institutional approval of canon publication.

3, Mark wrote in his own personal judgment without need to have any discussion with the 
others or approval from others, and published and promulgated the first canon for the first time 
in church history.

*** 1 and 2 look more likely than 3, since the ecological power and success of the first canon  
could hardly succeed when it was only a personal project not an institutional project, even 
when Mark held an important role position in Jerusalem camp, even when he could take 
advantage of his own personal access channels to Christian churches in Rome.

4, We cannot deny any one among three possibilities, and it might be something of mixed up 
and polarized of these threes, only with the issue of what takes the 1st priority and the 
second alike.

Mark is quite a faithful fellow to Paul when he is the real author of Gospel of Mark, since Gospel 
of Mark faithfully en-frames itself with "the son of God" doctrine and "good news" wording which 
are the trademarks of apostle Paul's.
Mark built the authentic Christian cyber temple with the first canon publication of Gospel of Mark.

Acts 15:36 shows that Mark was separated by the will of Paul's not Mark's, which tells John Mark
does not have to keep antagonistic or cold relationship necessarily with Paul when Paul is still 
his hero and the absolute Christian after Jesus.
John Mark could have suggested a mission strategy different from Paul's with his publication 
idea of Gospel like "media mission," which fits barely to the reason of not joining man-to-man
physical mission with Paul in Acts 15:36.

It is hardly possible for not only John Mark and his cousin Barnabas but also almost every 
Christian in the world at that time and even now, to run away from the Christian doctrine which 
is set up very firmly by the absolute Christian after Jesus, Paul.

Mark dare states and promulgates Paul's doctrine very much openly and formally from the 
beginning, "Jesus as the son of God" in spite of it could be prosecuted as one daring 
rebellious action by Rome, which pictures the inevitable wrath of a mouse to a cat whom 
encountered in dead end road.

reading could have kept themselves from revealing the name of canon writer openly, the 
amount of uprising hunger of knowledge and curiosity must have revealed the name of 
canon writer to a certain number of Roman citizens.

The volume of the first edition of Gospel of Mark could be imagined around ten to a hundred 
copies by handwriting, but it could have to be soon several hundred copies in the situation 
of easy copying process and good many literate readers and rich Christians, whom do not 
hesitate at all to pay the expense for their hunger and passion of the knowledge of new religion.

Here is a very interesting information about how quickly the information had been circulated 
in the first century C.E. taking advantage of rapid mail delivery system
digitaljournal.com/science/oldest-gospel-fragment-discovered-in-mummy-mask/article/424171#ixzz3ZZAQ9mJj .

Mark powerfully pushes off Roman Gods and the emperor whom is also the son of God very 
sternly which is the main doctrine of Mark's hero, apostle Paul's.
Gospel of Mark put stress on that our God is the real one, and our son of God and his story 
has much more practical and agreeable accounts to prove and accept.

Read Mark !  Everything has been very well foretold, prepared, planned, and executed in 
clockwise movement compared to your flimsily made up Gods and your grisly sons of God.

Mark tries his own best to shut off the tiring challenge disputation of Gentiles whether Jesus is  
the real son of God or not in Rome, and finally the feat of his canon doctrine has succeeded 
two full millennia with his bobcats like Matthew and Luke.

What a feat of Gospel of Mark and John Mark whom could be entitled the number three apostle 
after Great Paul and Pope Peter.

(Mark's canon can be compared to the nuclear ICBM project of Kim Jong-Eun to American 
Republicans whom refused six party peace treaty, which had been made by years of sweat taking 
process of the U.S., north Korea, south Korea, China, Russia, and Japan.

Republicans of Bush Government put the treaty in a trash can asking for continuous painful 
sufferings of thirty millions of North Korean people and warlike situation of Korean Peninsula, 
which requires and justifies firm and permanent deploy of the U.S. military in the most strategic 
region in the world with even collecting deploy expense from Korea.)

However, Mark's strategic exaggeration of Israel God YHWH as the father of Jesus and its 
following bobcat Gospels have resulted in catastrophic uprising Judaism as the backbone of 
Christianity, and the Old Testament as the true information source of all mankind origin and 
the nature, have paralyzed human ration and social order of the world for next two millennia.

Paper God YHWH and his bizarre tales made up by human deception have kept the throne of 
the absolute God in the world with no opponent, and still keeps being worshiped as "Our holy 
father" by billions of humans worldwide.

It is also possible that the name of Matthew was being used only to demonstrate and represent a 
good many members of the Jerusalem camp, as same as the possibility of the name of Theophius 
was only a symbolic representation of the ruling Sadducees and the ruling elite group of Israel.

However, Matthew and his divan were in a deep trouble in the process of granting or accepting  
"the canon of Mark" since it lacks of the nature of Jewish custom and anti-Gentile restrictions, which 
a good majority of the camp members and Jerusalem Christians could never honor, not only the 
title of canon, but also its existence.

Matthew (or his divan) eventually had to write and publish his (or divan's) own Gospel of Matthew,  
by very simple adding Jewish dressing on non-Jewish dish like this  instructiontodisciples.htm  .

2, Matthew (or his divan) could have felt offended or have been envious in many ways by the 
publication of Mark which has nothing to do with their blood nature of Jewish custom and 
anti-Gentile restrictions.

The whole Petrine camp could have felt betrayed by the publication of Mark whom had been 
their man before, or Matthew, an educated officer like tax collector whose income and social 
standing are never lower than those of Roman citizen Paul at least in Roman ruling society, 
could have needed to challenge post-Peter leadership in the camp by publishing a counter 
copy of Mark's canon and show off his (or divan's) power.

At around the beginning of 2nd century might be the time when "Matthew" started to deprive 
the 1st canon position of Mark, and dare put "heresy" on the brows of opponents local bishops 
like Marcion whom dare criticized not only the first canon "Matthew," but also the Judaism which 
was becoming the total background of the Christianity.

The process which replaces the original authentic Gospel "Mark" with falsely exaggerated 
and redacted Gospels has been expected from the beginning when apostle Paul had built up 
the palace of Jesus in the castle of Israel God YHWH in a harsh way.

The most monumental masterpiece of this very ambitious extremist Paul, "Romans," not only 
arms Christians with theological weapons of perfect self-defense, but also awaken and trigger 
non-believers and empire officers to be watchful and keep hostility against them, as much as 
they choose to surrender to be Christians or choose to thoroughly demolish Christians.

Paul himself, and Peter, and countless number of Christians had to be executed, paying the 
full price of "Romans" which dare declares vividly "Jesus is the son of God."

Three synoptics package the same contents quite differently, moreover, all different three 
synoptics have survived quite long two millennia, and maintained definite canon status in spite of 
their own self-contradictions and different styles of exaggeration.

whoisjesus.htm     Different paragraphs show the typical and different characteristics and 
styles of different writers in stating one single event that is more likely I would say, "Jesus 
ordered them not to follow the crowd and call him the 'Christ' otherwise, the Roman soldiers 
and high priest shall capture and put them in prison."

Triplet canon custom had continued for centuries and be settled down much before the final 
canonization process of Roman Empire in the 4th century.

Triplet canons meet the criteria and the taste of three definite different kinds of audience 
whom could never be in accordance with one canon, which are Jews, Gentiles, and high class 
Sadducee elites, and this canon custom and tradition had to be expanded to "quartet canon" 
followed and added by another one of mass Roman audience "Gospel of John," presumably 
much before the regime of emperor Constantine.

Besides these earthly reasons, it is also possible that Peter was called "Satan" by Jesus.

Peter had built up strong Pope's power with his miraculous healing power and head disciple's 
position for a few full decades after Jesus, which might have provided him with not only many 
followers and frantics but also mishaps which call him as high as Jesus like messiah.

Each of you says, ¡®I belong to Paul¡¯, or ¡®I belong to Apollos¡¯, or ¡®I belong to Cephas¡¯, or ¡®I belong to Christ.¡¯(1 Cor 1:21)   

Such disorder and agitation happened sometimes even when Paul and Peter were alive. 
Deteriorating the utmost fame of late Peter could be justified and somewhat likely when it aims at
troublesome frantic followers whom have a generation gap from the 1st generation disciples.)

1, Peter might have confessed and repented he is nothing but Satan repeatedly several times 
in guilty conscience for having denied the Lord three times before the cock crowed twice.
This habitual self-abusing style of Peter's has been written in "Mark" in a little exaggerated form, 
and has been copied to "Matthew" in accordance with no friction.
The part of "Satan Peter" is very frequently being disputed while "Peter denies Jesus" is little, 
and even Luke agrees and joins to copy  peterdeny.htm   from either Matthew or Mark, which 
is believed something truly happened.
Both Paul and Peter had worked hard days and nights quite passionately before they were 
executed, seemingly in order to shake off heavy amount of guilty conscience. 
Guilty conscience of coldhearted persecution of Paul to Christians, and repeated denial 
Jesus of Peter could have pushed both of Christian icons after Jesus quite straight forward 
so much powerfully, that we cannot see any accusation of their misbehavior afterwards.

2, Mark could have needed to deteriorate and reduce the powerful ruling cabinet of Peter's 
including his remained followers and frantic crowd by simply exaggerating how Peter was 
being rebuked as bad as Satan, which was agreed by "Matthew" to join to copy the 
'Satan Peter' of Mark.
If Mark denunciates Peter just because of circumcision like racial issue before with Paul, 
Matthew has no reason to copy 'Satan Peter' of Mark.

Irenaeus wrote (Against Heresies 3.1.1): "After their departure (of Peter and Paul from earth), 
Mark, the disciple and interpreter of Peter, did also hand down to us in writing what had been 
preached by Peter." supports that 'Satan Peter' is presumably not something of After Redaction 
in the 2nd century, since Mark was in good enough situation to write 'Satan Peter' after the 
death of Peter, not when Peter was alive.

It is a little possible that both different followers of "Mark" and "Matthew" agree to put 'Satan Peter' 
insertion in their quite different Gospels which must have been distributed over hundreds and 
thousands copies worldwide yet in the 2nd century in official version and privately copied 
version, although such quantity of papyrus Gospels can be easily paved over by the newer 
official version copies within a decade.

It is a little possible that there was something like ¡°canon publication workshop¡± through 
trans-local networks of bishops existed, and published Bible in volume and kept the 
authenticity of Bible too.
Naturally organized networks of local bishops and camp leaders could have decided to 
insert the exaggerated part of 'Satan Peter' in order to beat off Petrine circumcision supporters 
permanently, to keep themselves safe from plunging into endless and worthless tiring 
debates and quarrels.

falloftemple.htm   All synoptics say loud the same voice of their common wrath by the mouth 
of Jesus here in full accordance, represent they could be wise and decisive enough in pushing 
such a small patch job, and this kind of wise patch job fits to the needs of local bishops and 
camp leaders, and be repeated in case of 'Satan Peter' when they ran into the hottest issue 
of circumcision argument alike.

Matthew could be a bizarre enough unique black sheep to the pupils of Pauline school 
and the mankind, ruling over the world for two full millennia as the number one Christian canon 
with its very badly exaggerated statements.
Matthew has contributed to paralyze natural human ration very much in the name of conservative 
Christianity and simple innocent piety, and proved the filthy popularity of the mass crowd can 
always drive out and pave over the truth of religion easily.

"Luke's" could have had the similar kind of birth history that "Mark" has.   

Luke could have been commissioned to write "Luke" as a camp (or specific divan's) strategy 
in order to preach the high class elite group.  
Or, Luke felt need to write his own edition for his close clients like high class Sadducees, 
partly because he was not happy with both "Mark" and "Matthew."

Jerusalem Petrine camp could not see anymore of the first generation writers after Mark, 
Matthew, and Luke, which is one reason why the canon flood stopped after the publication 
of the final one "Luke."

Luke did not join to call Peter "Satan" because the purpose of his 1st and 2nd letters intend  
to attract and preach Theophius like Sadducee elite group with miraculous Jesus story, and 
deteriorating the fame of the group leader Peter does not help anything good to that purpose.
Instead, Luke felt quite freely copying the most parts of Quelle from Matthew when he wrote a 
special gold-plated edition of Gospel, Luke.

Luke very clearly excluded the parts which Sadducees dislike or hard to agree and accept 
with their social standing and profession, which had been quite noticeable to some accurate 
Bible scholars for centuries.

Luke had two books of Mark and Matthew printed yet before him, and must does not need to 
have any guilty conscience of copying the other Gospels in making his own edition, since the 
Sadducees like elite class must have kept distance from reading just street Gospels alike of 
poor and rebellion prosecuted street people kind.
If Luke was a surgeon, he would have much more access channels to high class Sadducee 
elites than ordinary Mark and Matthew. 
Why not he had several medical clients among Sadducee elites ?

The lengthy amount of Quelle suggests there might have been a proto-Matthew kind 
information scriptures existed before, which had been discontinued, paved over, and 
switched by new hard cover bind edition of Matthew.
There were easy Greek alphabets and social atmosphere of liberal information sharing 
in Greek-Roman world, which served the information needs in knowledge criteria, and 
fun and curiosity criteria too.

Mark could be the first hard cover bind edition old canon which had kept the absolute Gospel 
position for many years, whose hard cover bind edition could have triggered Matthew 
(or his divan) to feel envious of, or make up his (or their) mind to write a patriotic edition for 
their own people.
Quelle might have kept some of real information that Mark missed in Matthew's latest version print.

deathofjohn.htm     transfigure.htm  Mark's canon had to continue to wrestle with Matthew the first, 
and the later edition Luke the second.

These are quite odd noticeable paragraphs in slim book "Mark" whose paragraphs are much 
longer than those of Matthew and Luke very much unusually, which I roughly diagnose  
patch-redaction in its street fight like performance emulating with Matthew and Luke.

However, it looks marvelous doesn't it ?  Gospel of Mark still keeps the number two position 
in Bible, even though so many fancy illusive tales must have attracted a good majority of 
Bible audience very much with the later time trend that Jesus is made totally by Israel God, 
and is foretold by Jewish scriptures.

Mark must have kept "the absolute Gospel" position for many years by mainly Gentile 
Christians whose population was absolutely dominant in early churches.  

However, the Jerusalem camp which had the power of centralization like that of Roman Curia 
for a long while after Peter and Paul were executed, and their conservative followers must have 
given much more points to its fat bobcat edition Matthew in their rapidly growing process of 
Christianity popularization.
There must have been a certain group of people tried to protect the authenticity of Mark.

Marcion like acute and learned Christians could not agree with that historical authenticity 
could be polluted, bubbled, and thrived by the street trend of revised Judaism.

However, Mark, Matthew, and Luke could have got together and made the same voice of 
"After Redaction" process after they had watched the total destruction of the temple in 70 C.E.

I think, no Bible audience shall protest and impeach when all three synoptic Gospels 
intentionally and unanimously express their utmost wrath, dare changing the paragraph 
of old Gospels with their new redacted versions like this  falloftemple.htm.

I suggest one more possibility that such a small and noticeable patch job could be 
made in the Bible printing workshop of local bishops or the camp registrar without need to 
be granted by the networks of local bishops and camp leaders, and settled down by paving 
over the older copies with the silent approval of their clients and audience.

Possibility of Gospel and Acts of John Mark were transformed to the 1st and the 2nd epistle of Luke.

"Acts" consists of very close tales and vivid accounts of Peter and Paul which could be 
watched and recorded and kept by John Mark like close fellow of Peter and Paul, or 
something mission diary like personal belongings could be cared and kept also by their 
close fellow like Barnabas and John Mark.
It is a smarter way for Luke not to mention the name of real writer of Acts and simply 
continued to say "it is my second letter to you sir."
Luke never needs to say the first letter stems from Mark and Matthew, and the second 
one mostly comes from Acts of Mark, or the camp archive, or which belongs to John Mark like historian.

Luke presumably does not need a permission to quote Gospel contents of Mark and 
Matthew when it is an institutional project, or John Mark and Matthew and Luke could 
have kept much closer or different relationship than we think as Christian colleagues 
in the same Jerusalem camp.

Just because they wrote three different kinds of Gospels to meet the taste and regulation 
of three definitely different kinds of Christians, something like "rare" "medium" and "well done" 
to fit their audience, it does not follow that they have to keep antagonistic relationship.

I cannot find any definite information to define the relationship of three synoptics writers is 
"friendly," "unfriendly," or "cooperative," "antagonistic" yet at all.

John Mark does not need to raise an objection to print out "Act" in Luke's name when it 
works so well for mission purpose to unapproachable high class elites when Luke 
introduces it is his letter not his own WORK.

Acts of John Mark could have existed before Acts of Luke, but Acts of Mark happened 
to be paved over and discontinued by its more successful bobcat edition, more famous 
and gold-plated version of Luke's which has kept the number three canon position 
with many bubbles of fancy dramatization.

Acts of Luke also does not need to differentiate itself taking much time and effort 
as much as Gospel of Luke did.

Gospel of Mark had kept a certain stable number of audience to back up "Mark" and 
its number one or number two position at later time as the first born canon, while Acts 
of Mark was being surpassed in popularity and authority, and paved over by the Acts 
of Luke eventually.

I think it is quite possible that the first book and the second book of John Mark have 
been transformed to the first epistle and the second epistle of Luke.

Jesus' healing non Jewish girl.
 

I have stated inevitable reasons and necessities of three synoptic Gospels of 
the first generation Christian leaders John Mark, and Matthew, and Luke whom 
belonged to the Jerusalem Christian camp in my previous email, for three 
definite different audience groups whom are Roman Gentile Christians, Jewish 
Christians, and high priest Theophilos like ruling Sadducee elites.

I was being asked by one theology Professor to account for the phrase of
Jesus' healing non Jewish girl in MARK, when the Gospel of Mark is the first 
strategic institutional canon of the Jerusalem Christian camp for the Gentiles,
which says ¡®Let the children be fed first, for it is not fair to take the children¡¯s food 
and throw it to the dogs.  Mark 7:27   nonjewishgirl.htm
¡®I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.¡¯    Matt 15:24
(MATTHEW inflated MARK a little in his own routine job as he always does.)  

Mark 7:27 is an inevitable sweating theological accomplishment of either 
Jerusalem camp leaders or Mark alone, before Gospel of Mark started to be 
disseminated to Roman gentiles with the official permission of Jerusalem camp
for the first time more than three decades after the execution of Jesus.
Gospel of Mark had to kill the huge gap of two birds of Jerusalem camp leaders 
and Roman Gentile Christians with this wonderful rhetorical innovation.

Mark 7:27 successfully justifies why Jesus had cured non Jewish girl to the Jews,
with the suggestion of a compromising generous theology to Roman Christians.
The reason why Luke does not join here is, because the issue of Gentiles is too hot 
to take when the main audience of LUKE are high priest Theophilos like authentic Jews.

I was also being asked to account for omission of the entirety of Mark 6:45-8:26 in LUKE.
In my idea, Quelle is nothing but what LUKE chooses to copy from what MATTEW wrote 
something not in MARK with special hot Jewish peppering in his own folk manner.
Here is my solution why LUKE does not join MATTHEW and MARK.

1, sheep without a shepherd   sheepwithoutshepherd.htm
Luke doesn't want to bother priesthood issue which Saddcees almost monopolize.
2, Jesus walks on the water   onwater.htm
Luke is afraid that this phrase is too much miraculous to Sadducees and could have 
been ridiculed by Sadducee society before, and got notorious feedbacks.
3, Jesus' curing the non Jewish girl  nonjewishgirl.htm
it is too hot racial issue to the audience of LUKE whom are the ruling authentic Jews.
4, Jesus' curing the deaf   deaf.htm 
This phrase of Mark is oddly longer than that of Matthew, which could be after redaction
later than not only LUKE but also MATTHEW.
5, Jesus' miraculous feeding thousands   7000.htm
I suggested that Quelle is nothing but what Luke chooses from Matthew wrote
and inflated.  This phrase of Matthew contains grisly curse to Sadducees whom are 
the main audience of LUKE.

Possibility of seed Gospel of Paul is conjectured with these reasons,

1, Paul is the most curious of and appropriate person with literacy, whom to start
to search for the whole life and teachings of Jesus whom had never met in flesh.
2, Paul had ample amount of time of a few decades after he had been converted,
which is a good enough time to proceed not only to assemble data of Jesus' life
and teachings, but also complete the whole theological perspective of Jesus as 
the son of God regardless of his additional attention.
3, How much has it been completed, and whether Paul had shared his seed One 
with his students or not is an enigma that we have to ponder to find the clue of.
4, The whole amount of the first Gospel of Mark had been initiated and completed 
by a single writer John Mark alone as is written in Pappias' letter "heard from Peter" 
sounds not only unlikely but also thoughtless, when Paul had much more reasons 
to start than John Mark with his superior writing ability which has proven in his 
many epistles than almost a novice John Mark.

Possible process of writing "Gospel of Paul," and be paved over by John Mark.

Paul had had a very firm belief that Christians are dangerous group of rebellions  
whom to challenge the absolute highness of YHWH and Judaism authenticity, and 
to be eliminated thoroughly as much as is written in something like grisly "Joshua."
He must have had a certain amount of information and investigation about Jesus 
and Christians before he made up his mind to wipe them off when he belonged to 
the orthodox Pharisee camp.

Encountering super natural miraculous reality of Jesus could not convert himself right
away, and he needed to calm down and shorten the huge gap of religious fantasy 
of Judaism and the reality of Jesus in his process of building up existential Christianity.
What other reasons and happenings could have helped him to covert this giant Pharisee
frantic, and where does the idea of friendly relationship with gentiles come from 
including a very hot issue of "circumcision" alike ?

That could be :

1, Jesus never discriminated gentiles whose principle was observed and followed by 
Paul in spite of some textual bantering in Gospel of Mark (curing non Jewish girl.htm), 
and Acts 10 (peter's vision.htm). (Leviticus chap 11, Deuteronomy chap 14)
Healing non Jewish girl defends and justifies why Jesus had to break anti gentile 
restriction, with making up some fine compromises for both Judeans and gentiles, 
"Gentiles if you kneel down and beg like a dog, you can share the cookies of Jesus."

Luke did his own best in Gospel of Luke and Acts to melt the frozen hearts of 
ruling sadducee elites whose main talent looks allegory of holy text and holy ghosts.
Luke defends and justifies the camp leader Peter by describing his mission to 
gentiles as eating profane and unclean animals, directly ordered by holy voice.
We never be surprised by Luke's literature talent at all, which has proven in his 
previous fiction "Gospel of Luke" with many fancy angel and holy ghost tales.
Luke's fictions aiming at ruling sadducee elites suggest us to imagine how vainly
the sadducee elites were addicted to the authority of holy ghost and textual allegory.
Luke seems to have done his own best not only to move ruling sadducee elites to
the sides of Judean Christian, but also to compete with Matthew and possible street 
Gospels in the field of textual allegory and holy imagination.
You can also imagine what the job of "surgeon" was to be at Luke's ancient time with 
the skill of allegorical interpretation of the text and rich mysterious imagination like that
of an exorcist alike.

2, Paul could have asked questions and got direct answers from "reply of prayer" 
which had himself understood of the hot theological issues conflicting both in his mind 
and others, when his prayer is something rational and mutual communication alike in
(1 Corinthians 14:13-18), not anything just ritual and unknown.
However, it is very clear that Paul never asked an impolite question i.e. "Lord, are you 
really the son of God?" which is not only the border line of Paul's son of God theology, 
but also had left theological turmoil to us gentile citizens.
Textual God YHWH is the perpetual grave stone in Paul's faith, that cannot be moved 
at all, or something does not have to be degraded in the process of honoring Jesus.
It seems Paul's firm belief and strategy that poor Jesus could be shined fully only when 
the palace of Prince Jesus is placed in the castle of YHWH.

Paul had to know more about Jesus in detail in his process of confirming Jesus' divinity. 
( paultojerusalem.htm  Act 9:26-29, Gal 1:18-19 )
We do not know when street Gospels started to flood, however, street Gospels had 
started to be written not earlier than when Paul started to assemble data, and not later
than when Mark started to write "Gospel of Mark" with the reasons I conjecture.
1, There was nobody yet to be more curious about Jesus' detailed life than Paul whom
encountered the most powerful Jesus than anyone right after the death of Jesus.
Paul's personal Gospel is the probably the oldest seed one, including street Gospels.
Street Gospels started to show off very naturally with the increasing demands of curiosity 
of the crowd, and fictions of different personal piety or divans, and fun stories of money 
making purposes with story-telling job like Arabian night etc. etc.

It is not likely that Paul had started to write his seed Gospel for others in the beginning,
however, he had to build up and continue a certain kind of "unity" of his Gospel in order to 
prove his Gospel is the Gospel of son of God YHWH even to himself.
The core concept of "unity" could have made his personal one bigger and bigger like a 
snowman in the process of organizing and meeting the ends of all textual allegories, and 
finally had produced out one objective canon like Gospel whose objective value is too big 
to be possessed by one single disciple.

You need at least three to four copies of one valuable historical text 
you have written in order not to have it lost or damaged even when 
it is not completed fully yet though, which you should carry often 
(or always) with you in your carrying pouch when it is an absolute 
reference text of your vocation. 
Paul could have written a few copies of the same kind of seed Gospel, 
and felt need to leave each copy to a bishop like student of each different 
mission camp for the purpose of keeping the valuable data safe the first, 
and possibly the study of his students while he was away from the each camp the second.

All Gospels in different mission camps did not have to be exactly identical same copies, 
even though they kept the same kind of structure and writing order by one single writer. 
"A" could have something newly added by Paul when "A" was in the process of revising 
with new data or thought in Paul's hand, while the other ones "B, C, D" were sleeping in 
the desks of different camp custodians. 
It is a little possible that Mark, Matthew, and Luke borrowed very slightly different Gospels 
of Paul when they published out the Gospels of their own names. 
It is also a little possible that Matthew started with one Gospel of Paul which had much 
more patriotic insertions and extra data like "Quell.

When I suggested hypothesis of "Gospel of Paul" for the first time a few years ago, 
one theologian doubted the existence of it with "Comment on Gospel of Paul" never exists 
in any letter of Paul which is supposed to be." 
I replied him with the answers below ; 

1, Paul could have permitted and shared it with only a few of important bishop like students, 
not many open public like the open audience of his epistles when reading and interpreting 
the text is not an open and usual job at ancient time, presumably with the same kind of 
reasons that Catholic had not permitted for a quiet a long period of time. 
2, The amount of Paul's epistles are the amount which have survived, not the exact amount of
the epistles that Paul really had written in a few decades of his passionate mission. 

Chronological process and relationship of Paul and John Mark before publication of Gospel. 

Is there any possibility of John Mark's proposal of publication of institutional canon to Paul 
a lot earlier than Gospel of Mark ?

Does it sound likely that apostle Paul had no written data of Jesus' life and teachings 
on his hands which could be a little lengthy in chronological order ?
Did John Mark not have anything and advice from his superior rabbi like apostle Paul
before he decided to publish the first institutional canon, Gospel of Mark ?

All possible scenarios before the publication of the first institutional canon, "Mark."

Barnabas is described as one reliable patron of apostle Paul, and his cousin
John Mark is described as one faithful assistant of two great ones, Paul and Peter.
What John Mark heard from Peter could be almost as same as what Paul heard from
Peter, since this close triangle relationship looks something not have any reason to 
hide or manipulate regarding the issues of their lord Jesus.
However, John Mark must have needed to pump in the general information pond 
Peter in his process of publication of the first canon as is written in Pappia's letter.

If Paul had written quite correctly with details, John Mark had no reason to dare put
something nonsense rudely, and brush unnecessarily upon what apostle Paul had done.  
However, seed Gospel of Paul could be something for personal or at best divan
usefulness of local bishops of Paul's students alike, while John Mark's is something 
of open public usefulness of all Christians, mainly aiming at cultural Roman Christians.

Acts 15:36-39 and Colossians 4:10 state the relationship change of Paul and Mark,
and 2 Timothy 4:9-11 and 1 Peter 5:13 which are suspected "forgeries" could still
help us to take advantage of about half of their historicity, since even forgeries could 
contain some historical facts which the writers did not need to LIE or exaggerate.

New testament shows what a passionate, definite, straight, and firing temper apostle 
Paul has, while John Mark remains as a faithful and wise assistant to both Paul and Peter.
Acts 15:36-39 let us be curious about what really had happened between Paul and 
John Mark, whose anger amount was as much as Paul and Barnabas parted company.
"Barnabas took Mark with him and sailed away to Cyprus." shows that Paul was quite
angry as much as Barnabas could not agree the anger amount of apostle Paul, which 
means Paul's anger was something subjective not as objective as Barnabas could accept.

Is there any possibility of that Mark suggested "media mission" of sharing openly or 
publishing seed Gospel of Paul whose efficiency and performance are lot bigger than 
"man to man flesh mission" like that of apostle Paul's, and such characteristics conflict 
was why Mark did not accompany them in work?
There is not any bit of evidence of that Mark had suggested it, or discussed about 
media mission of official canon with Paul at later time, however, the flood of street 
Gospels and street trend of false exorcism alike in Acts 19:12-16, 1 Corinthians are
good enough backgrounds of John Mark to push forward "media mission strategy."

"Colossians" which is generally believed the latest final epistle of Paul could let us
imagine how well their relationship was recovered after they had parted company.
Seed Gospel of Paul could be more ripened, good enough to be opened to the public.
Paul could be fully understood and agreed with the needs of publication of canon 
about one decade after the first characteristics conflict with John Mark.
Paul in jail whom to risk the execution could have given full access right to John Mark.
Paul could believe that John Mark was the best person to keep his seed Gospel safe,
and put something on it if Peter kind "walking Gospel" wanted to add something which
Paul missed before the official publication.

Someone reminds that Paul had believed the kingdom would come in his own lifetime
(1 Thessalonians 4 ;  1Corinthians 7), and there would be no future generations to 
pass the story onto.  
1 Thessalonians 4; 1 Corinthians 7 show how overconfident Paul was, which could 
be one clear reason why Paul did not permit "canon publication" in his early time.

However, the whole situation including the reality of the need of institutional canon 
could have grown a lot more in his later time, as much as he had to say "Go ahead."
What an odd situation that could be !  Christianity had grown more and more,
however, the head quarter and the leaders and local bishops had no canon, neither
in their desks nor on their hands (except for skeletal seed Gospel of Paul?), when
presumably there must have been serious challenges of flood of street Gospels 
with odd tales, and heresies of street superstitions alike.

Ancient people in ancient world which must have produced so many apocalyptic 
crises to a good majority of civilians, could have had their souls and spirits rested 
only by being addicted or fall for street superstitions and scriptural allegories, 
which is a good enough blue ocean for the thrive of street Gospels.

It could be one another possibility that Paul could have completed seed Gospel, 
a lot more than just "skeletal," in his process of buttressing the salvation theology 
of son of God (not after) before his masterful letter, "Romans."

Influence of Street Gospels to "Synoptics (Matthew, Mark, Luke)"
 

The earliest possible time of beginning of the flood of street Gospels, roughly guessed
is right after the execution of Jesus, whose echo and shadows after execution must have 
left countless amount of turmoil and questions of who he really is, whom he met and 
what he taught, what miracles he made, and how his existence is being continued, etc. etc.

People had easy to learn Greek alphabets and liberal cultural atmosphere of Greek-Roman world,
which could dictate and publish whatever they heard and saw from the scale of personal 
diary to public money making novels with the pleasure of restriction free imagination.

Disciples, and Christian followers, and their church members whom had been with Jesus
in flesh or some ones close to them did not need to pay attention to street Gospels, since 
they were divans of the first generation walking Gospels, whom did not suffer from the 
shortage of knowledge and information of Jesus.

However, even disciples and their close Christian fellows must have been asked to 
respond to general issues of the possible street concerns and common sense related, 
regarding validity of Jesus whom started to be called "son of God," subsequently "Christ."
In this kind of practical daily life process, they could have found and picked up some
appropriate answers and excuses by taking advantage of street logic and allegories to 
keep their status safe and justified.

Street Gospels could provide their show windows with so many fancy and intriguing tales 
of human imaginations and deceptions and exaggerations, which were too mean and rare 
sometimes, but very useful in justifying the theology of the brand new religion "Christianity" 
to mostly uneducated ancient civilians and Christians.

John Mark, the author of the first canon Gospel, must have done very much laborsome
job if he had taken over the skeletal Gospel of Paul first, and then put some tale muscle
on them by dictating what he heard from the first pope Peter, and finally completed "Gospel
of Mark" whose canon dignity aimed to beat off challenges of heretical thoughts and tales.

There had been more than three decades between execution of Jesus and the publication 
of the first institutional canons of "Synoptics," which is long enough time for street Gospels 
to be prosperous and to build up strong earthly Babel tower alike of big snowman Jesus.
I do suggest a possibility that individual uniqueness of each Synoptics came from adopting
restriction-free imagination tales in the pond of variety street Gospels.

The final ones at the ending period of time right before the publication of Synoptics must have 
been very well developed with good reputation and popularity as well, surviving long time of the 
process of trials and errors by many ancient craftsmen.

What an wonderful insertion of "genealogy" like "prose of certified check" in the beginning 
of Gospel of Matthew and Chapter 3 of Luke, which is not only an grandeur looking introduction of 
authoritative canon, but also a heavily built up rampart which can ensure the safety of Jerusalem 
Christian camp very effectively, from against the tiring attack of high priest Sadducees and 
pharisees like hostile group of jingoistic nationalists and their frantic followers.

It is more likely that Matthew (or his divan) and Luke would rather adopt very useful parts
from abundant contents of many street Gospels free of charge than inventing redaction 
of fancy stuff, which is not only time taking, but also difficult and risky when they had to 
react in no time to MARK like impious and impractical canon which dare has no "gentile 
restriction" prose, no matter what Jesus really did before.

Adopted and modified, or refinished and formalized paragraphs from street Gospels roughly 
conjectured ; "genealogy," "annunciation," "Mary meets Elizabeth," circumcision of Jesus," "
childhood of Jesus," "beatitudes," "Lord's prayer," "the ascension," and "father and son narrative
style" of Jesus even in MARK.

Street Gospels could have provided quite a bunch of useful items to choose from which 
had proven not only their wonderful performance, but also very likely credibility to mass population 
in the process of survival of the fittest under liberal Greek-Roman cultural atmosphere.
It is a lot more convenient to pick up fish in an old fine fish market than to catch in the river,
when the fish market has provided themselves with all kinds of fish for DECADES of age,
with exception of Peter like professional fisherman-walking Gospel.

Many professional writers, composers, and chefs make wonderful professional outcomes
by just picking up a very small part of street tales, hymns, lyrics, melody, and street food.
Nag Hammadi codices (Gnostic Gospels) are a very small part of street Gospels which 
have survived two millennia, which suggest a possibility of hundreds kinds of different street
Gospels had been written and disappeared, thrown away, burned off, and paved over
by canon Gospels, and many incidents which were missed to be written in church history.

Quite many street Gospels, of quite many different kinds of piety, by quite many different 
kinds of writers, for quite many different kinds of ancient lay audience could be imagined.
Some of them were crazy and worthless, while some others could contain something strong 
and attractive enough to move the minds of even old Christians of Jerusalem camp, since 
Jesus had left so many unresolved tasks which could be answered only by human imagination 
i.e. street Gospels, and street heresies like Gnosticism.

Bible was not written to write the truth and history in objective criteria.  Bible was written
rather to have the readers preached and surrender, and moved to their sides, and finally make 
their own people or followers for the profit and safety of their divans the first, and 
well-defended and justified the second.   
Bible writers sometimes do not hesitate to give mean and evil attacks to their opponents, 
and tell bold lies and curses, no matter if it is good or not, no matter if it is true or false.

The main theme of old testament (Tanak) with no doubt is, there is only one righteousness 
which is absolutely subject to the holiness that has been made up and crafted by professional 
priestly family. 
Submission and obedience are the best virtues described, as Hegel named "faith of a blind dog," 
which have to be in the propaganda Text, which handed down to New Testament as well, 
in one of the most jingoistic countries in the world due to their geopolitical situations.

Gospel writers tried their own bests to meet the needs of a good majority of lay people 
in order to attain goals of their divans as many as they can in greed, jealousy, and piety.
Peter in Ecclesiastical History Book 6 Chapter 14 by Eusebius shows he could have been
a little reluctant to dictate to John Mark and publish one another "bubble Gospel" he was
afraid, no matter if it is an institutional canon or personal publication, which another 
walking Gospel Paul could have felt the same.

- - ¡°The Gospel according to Mark had this occasion. As Peter had preached the Word publicly 
at Rome, and declared the Gospel by the Spirit, many who were present requested that Mark, 
who had followed him for a long time and remembered his sayings, should write them out. 
And having composed the Gospel he gave it to those who had requested it. When Peter learned 
of this, he neither directly forbade nor encouraged it.¡± - -

"Quelle," luckily revived street Gospel.

A few of primary street Gospels could be imagined which had survived very well among 
quite many plain ones, which had good amount of popularity and reputation as well with 
the scripture performance at the same time, before the publication of the first canon 
Gospel, Gospel of Mark.
Primary street Gospels must have supplied what many lay people demanded when there 
was no written reference text about Jesus, his teachings, miracles, and background.

Plenty of possibilities could be imagined that John Mark had read contents of some 
popular and odd street Gospels to Peter and Paul, in his process of having themselves
understood how badly Christianity was being misled, and manipulated by street gossips 
and rumors .. and the necessity and importance of publishing a canon text.
John Mark had read the contents of popular street Gospels, not only to have them 
understand how badly the mass population fell for ridiculous fictions, but also to have 
helps and institutional grants from them.
If John Mark had read street Gospels to Peter and Paul, Quelle must have been included 
in them and turned down by Peter with his possible judgments of ; "Not that I know of," 
"Hardly possible," "Fake," "Ridiculous," "Groundless and worthless," etc. etc.

I suggest that Quelle is the part that was not able to pass through the qualification test 
of Mark and Peter whom were preparing for "one definite official canon."
However, Quelle could have been very much used to not only many lay people, but also 
Matthew and Luke like patriotic executive staff (or their divans) in Jerusalem camp 
for many years.
Divan of Matthew, and divan of Luke could have argued with John Mark, "Why should 
you skip to take such valuable and powerful part which helped good many of lay 
people to support us, just because they failed to pass the eyes of you and Peter?"
Such arguments could be pressed down and ignored when Peter and Paul like walking 
Gospel-fundamentalists were alive. 
However, the situation was being totally changed after the execution of Peter and Paul,
as much as Gospel of Matthew pushed Gospel of Mark off to the second or the worse.

John Mark could deserve the first Christian historian, when apostle Paul is the first and 
absolute Christian theologian.     John Mark and pope Peter had no reason to take 
advantage of false street gossips and folk allegories in cheap piety, while Matthew (or 
his divan) with their hot tempered patriotism and opportunism were in the position to 
take advantage of anything, no matter if it was already turned down by Mark and Peter
and thrown away to the junk yard of Jerusalem head office.

Matthew (or his divan) was defying absolute authority of the first canon of Mark and 
Peter with publishing his (or divan's) own patriotic edition in Hebrew, reviving the items 
which had been thrown away in Jerusalem camp before.

Luke followed to take Quelle in addition to his own special contents which is unique 
only to Gospel of Luke for his own special purpose.

Quelle was simply non-canonical Gospel phrases to the eyes of Mark and his superior 
Peter, which is the reason why Mark and Peter turned down to take different from 
Matthew and Luke.  

John Mark must have had a chance to review and look into some major street Gospels 
with the help of Peter, in his desperate process of completing a masterful canon.
It is also possible that there is a part of Quelle which has some true words of Jesus,
but failed to be included in the first canon of MARK, or Mark missed to take as well
as many theologians have believed, which I am not able to find yet though.

How ridiculous Quelle of  the centurion's servant / nobleman's son is, which flatters
many Judeans and Matthew and Luke like nationalists very much with lots of joy,
which could have made John Mark, Peter, and Paul sigh and speechless.

What a troublesome Quelle of  not a peace but a sword is, for a good many jingoistic 
Judeans whom demanded their national hero Joshua like fighter messiah.
Quelle writer costumes Jesus with the armor of Joshua alike so as to match the name 
value of Jesus whom really initiated "religious quarrel" in them.

Package of "Genealogy, " "birth of Jesus," "circumcision of Jesus, " and "childhood of Jesus" 
are natural and inevitable continuation of common sense when nick name of Jesus, "son of 
God," is growing up on the street by the crowd of Judeans.

What a very much shocking news it will be, if the most representative Christian propaganda  
verse  love your enemy  turns out nothing but a verse of street Gospel, and is something 
adopted to a part of Quelle by technical Bible writers Matthew and Luke !
If it is only a part of street Gospel nothing to do with Jesus, we should admire ability and
performance of Quelle writer, and also definite decision of John Mark and pope Peter whom  
dare gave up such a pretty and impressive verse with their historian conscience.
If it really is nothing but a forgery came from street fiction, it shall be one hundred times  
more shocking than the President of Switzerland bought a counterfeit Rolex watch in  
official Rolex shop of Geneva.

It is not difficult at all to see such "lavish amount of charity and odd affection" in other  
kinds of human religion, such as Buddhism and Taoism like religion of self-illusion and  
self-deception of lavish abstract mind of ancient gurus, with feast of many odd and  
Quixote kind of wordings which do not have to be responsible for the real practice.
We know quite many wonderful sermons of quite many famous guru's, however, it is  
hardly possible to see if they really practiced, and if it really works in our practical lives.
Were it true words of Jesus, Jesus has to lavishly love Iscariot Judas, Pontius Pilate, 
beastly Roman soldiers, and high priests as well, which seems too many and too bizarre.

It is Gresham's law in economics that "bad money drives out good money."  
It is Gresham's law in Art and culture that "bubble artists drive out true artists."
It is Gresham's law in politics that "lying politicians drive out honest politicians."
It is Gresham's law in Christianity that "popular scriptures drive out true scriptures."

Even Mark and Peter could have wished "love your enemy" was told by Jesus, however 
very sorrily, "love your enemy" seems to fail to pass through the canon qualification  
test of John Mark and pope Peter just because it is not true, which could be one small  
reason for Matthew like patron to keep a kind of antipathy with MARK.

Luke has no hesitation at all to copy verses of Talmudic folk wisdom of Matthew in
a row of  the devil returning with seven more  debt  the talents   the lost sheep  etc. 
Luke, on the other hand, very technically skips to copy what his readers high class 
sadducee elites must have disliked, or must be very unhappy, or at least reluctant 
to accept as well, which are the verses of MARK and MATTHEW in full accordance
though.

Who wrote the street Gospels ?

Jesus must have had a good many number of Judean sympathizers after he was  
executed by the aggressor empire, as well as John the baptist was executed by
a gentile ruler "Herod" whom was hated by most Judeans.

Such a patriotic sympathy could have triggered some Judeans to think up a popular
allegorical connections of "Annunciation," "Mary meets Elizabeth" alike between the two.
Such sympathizers could have tried to understand and embrace Jesus as someone,
whose class is higher than an ordinary good prophet in addition to an offspring of
royal family of Judaism bloodline.

They could have tried to put a priestly vestment on Jesus with writing "street Gospels,"
which had no definite supervisors' eyes like John Mark and pope Peter of "the Gospel  
of Mark."

 Luke reluctantly adopted royal genealogy of Jesus in half size of Matthew, however,
added special spotlight additions on John the baptist instead, whom had no troubles
with Sadducees before in Conception of john, and Mary meets Elizabeth, and
Birth of john the baptist in the beginning chapter of the Gospel of Luke.

Luke joins Matthew in Birth of jesus with the change of "wise men" of Matthew
to "angel of the Lord" and "a multitude of heavenly host," which are much friendly
characters with Sadducees.
However, Luke keeps himself from joining risky redaction of Escapte to Egypt which
sets up Jesus as a sibling or rebirth of Moses, which might have been told "fraud"
before by Jesus family etc.

Luke instead added Circumcision of Jesus which was a hot topic between Pauline
Christians and Jerusalem Christians at that time, in order to make Sadducees
happy and be sure.

 In the entire process of making up Jesus friendly with Judean readers, street Gospel
writers could have made Jesus someone friendly or similar kind of unlicensed street
preacher whom are "Pharisee," no matter if intentionally or by accident, which has
tempted some Bible scholars to think up an idea of "Pharisaic Jesus."

I had expressed a definite objection to one world famous theologian a few years ago
whom suggested "Pharisaic Jesus" with saying, "how Jesus could deny the words of
Moses if he was a Pharisee?" "how a Pharisee could surpass the highness of Moses
whom is the number two next to YHWH in Divorce of moses.htm and Sabbath.htm?"

The writers of street Gospels took pleasure of making up street allegories of son of
God theology, and lavishly had Jesus teach folk wisdom of Talmudic ideas of Judaism,
in order to supply the pleasure to the needs of Judean people whom wanted to
believe Judaism could do anything and everything.

Jesus did play the roles they wanted, dreamed, and imagined like a multi-functional
"Superman, son of YHWH" in the street Gospels which had been paved over by
newly published bobcat like canons of Matthew and Luke.

One of the most iconic teachings of pharisaic Jesus is "Lord's prayer" which is
counted as a Christian version of Judean "Kaddish," which has presumably much
older history not only than "Lord's prayer," but also than history of the nation.

Ancient society is full of fatherless children and widows whom are the outcomes of
ceaseless wars, severe labor, poverty, and shortage of food and medical facility.
Temple might have taken the roles of a half-government, half-legislature, half-judiciary,
and multi-purpose charity organization in ancient times.

I have seen one orphan was being raised in a Buddhist temple and got accustomed
to call the Buddha "father," which encouraged me to suggest that many ancient
Judeans had to call YHWH "father," which had initiated Judean prayer "Kaddish"
from quite long long time ago.

Jesus definitely turned into a very friendly master folk guru by teaching popular
"Lord's prayer," which shows the fine performance of street Gospel writers.

Quelle is thickened in the sermon and parables of Jesus which are the tasks of
"the Pharisees," whom are comparably a lot more liberal and practical in translating
and teaching Torah than Sadducees.

Introduction of Jesus' sermon starts with that Jesus dare teaches in their synagogue,
and great crowds followed Jesus, which Luke copies Matthew a little timidly.
Jesus is preaching "Beatitudes," like a grand master guru with great crowds from
far different places like that of a famous preachers' well organized.

Jesus declares an excuse that his mission is not against the Torah but to fulfill it.
What a brand new advanced ethics of Killing and adultery in something like dialectical
process of Matthew which Luke could not dare copy.
Jesus' ethics of Divorce looks to have been fully accepted by Matthew which Luke
timidly copied.

Theology of new-wave Pharisees alike in "Swear" has been so much powerfully
declared, mainly aimed at Sadducees that Luke cannot dare to copy.

Love enemy of Matthew looks agreed by Luke to copy and be used to preach Sadducees.
Alms and fasting of Matthew was something too far from Sadducees which Luke gave up.
Store treasure in heaven is an wonderful teaching of poor pharisees to pay more offering
into their pockets, which Luke agreed and preached Sadducee elites in lengthy verses.

Light of body and Lilies of the fiield look typical kind of Talmudic wisdom of Judean pharisees.
Why did writers of street Gospels (Quelle) love these words "Do not judge not" I conjecture is,
"judging matters" should remain the job of professional Pharisees which makes them
earn livings constantly.

If the Judean civilians judge matters by themselves without having religious guidance from
Pharisees, Pharisees shall lose the jobs of earning livings.
"Do not judge" of Jesus implies similar kind of warning of Catholic priests to lay Catholics,
whom had ordered not to possess the "Bible," and not to discuss the doctrine and Catholic.

"Do not judge" is followed by Seek and it will be open" like a package priestly wisdom to
most Judeans which defines, "Clients, you only order.  Packing and shipping is our job.
Your satisfaction is guaranteed eternally."

Consequence of folk wisdom of Enter through the narrow gate,  Tell trees by their fruits,
Foundation of heavenly father,  Nothing is covered up,  Not peace but a sword are
sparkling at the ending part of Quelle without need to identify who really wrote them.

They know well of the Torah in more practical and pragmatic value than scriptural value.
They like Jesus, but also take advantage of Jesus at the same time by cleverly disguising
their identities.

They seem to hate elite priests by criticizing professional Pharisees and Sadducees,
which suggests either they are minority group of Pharisees compared to the majority,
or someones like novice preachers without earthly success who know and practice well
with religious passion, but being paid little compared to elite Pharisees and Sadducees.

How about amateur Pharisees whom could qualify the conditions described above,
whose religious code could be placed between ordinary pharisees and apostle Paul ?
How about a miniature kind conflict of the Protestants and Catholics in the 1st century ?
How about innocent Pharisee group whose wrath and frustration have been piled up
for years against the elite priestly groups, whom just had monopolized the profits, and
benefits, and the shares of religious business for quite a long time even with succeeding
to the next generation.
A kind of class conflicts of Judean priests could be imagined to identify whom they are.

Yes, Martin Luther was a Catholic whom dare declared the war against the corrupt
Catholics whom had monopolized such things for centuries, as well as famous and
filthy elite pastors of Korea have been indicted by a plain street preacher like Me.

I was in the class of a rabbi teacher Dr. David Winston more than twenty years ago.
Winston said, "Pharisees criticized Pharisees." (as well as pastors criticize pastors.)
There are many tasks and duties of Pharisees, and also many different kinds and families
they came from, which could have themselves to criticize each other with some conflicts,
on the business battle field of priests under the rule of survival of the fittest.

Quelles is not only progressed one step further in dialectical process of street theologians
of the next generation, but also progressed offensively denying vested rights and privileges
of elite Sadducees and Pharisees.

When Pharisees are a group of unlicensed folk preachers under no definite official
guidance and probation, they could be progressed to diversely variety i.e. professional
Pharisees and amateur Pharisees, full time Pharisees and part time Pharisees, well
educated ones studied with famous teachers and poorly educated ones barely
maintaining the status.

Can it help you to define different Pharisee types, and figure out that they might be the
ones to meet the characteristics of street Gospel writers in www.christiantoday.com ?

1. The "shoulder" Pharisees, who wear their good actions on their shoulders for
everyone to see.
2. The "wait-a-little" Pharisees who always find excuses for putting off a good deed.
3. The "bruised" Pharisees, who run into walls because they are so busy avoiding
looking at women.
4. The "pestle" or hunched-over Pharisees, who walk bent over in pretended humility.
5. The "ever-reckoning" Pharisees, always weighing their good deeds against the bad.
6. The "fearful" Pharisees, who are are frightened of doing the wrong thing.
7. The "God-loving" Pharisees, who really love God from their heart and take delight
in his law.

Non-profitable female birth made sinners.  (Groundless sexism)   

Ancient people had a custom to throw away female babies as soon as they found  
the new babies are female (female infanticide) with the reasons that I guess ;

1, They did not have birth control and their food  supply is very much limited, when
the male children could make much more labor and usefulness than female children
though they consume same amount of food and time, which decides a critical  economy.

2, Even when the parents sell their children to patrons in order to feed not only children 
but also to feed parents, strong male children could get paid a lot more than females.
3, The usefulness and the value of female civilians to the rulers is a lot less than
male civilians whom could be switched to be used for combat purpose in case of 
national crises and corvee like free labor.
The rulers in small countries with limited food supply and wrestling with survival issue
could have set up a strategy to limit the number of female civilians whose community 
value is a lot less economical and more limited than male civilians.
The rulers need to kill newly born female babies in order to meet the survival calculation.

4, The rulers of the opponent tribes on the contrary had to kill the male babies in order
to suppress the monotonic increasing of their occupied tribes i.e. Herod's massacre 
(Matthew 2:16), and Pharaoh's massacre (Exodus 1:6-22).

5, The norms of a couple and family of a good majority of low class ancient people 
could not be easily imagined by today's ordinary people with abundant welfare.
The shortage of female members in community had to result in prevailing of homosexual
and bestiality of low class ancient males whom could not afford heterosexual partners.
< click here >

 Ancient people had to wait many months before they find out if the new babies 
are male or female, in a similar process of waiting for expensive lottery results.
The male birth means a luck while the female birth means loss, and a bad luck.
This kind of economical situation could have led ancient people to set up a theory 
of luck or bad luck, mythologizing where the bad luck comes from, creating grisly 
curse to female beings as incurable fatal seed of the sin in Genesis one.
Woman is regarded as incomplete deviated being whom is made of a part of
man's body, whom has made man to be deported out of the paradise for good.

Ancient people could have imagined why a man is made of dust of the ground by 
seeing a dead body becomes dust of the ground and bones, whose utilitarian 
imaginations could have piled up and pushed Genesis writer to state the origin
of humankind, animals and the world.
The solid authoritative concepts of God as the potter and women as his sinful 
creatures have been transcended to Jeremiah chapter 18, Isaiah chapter 29, and 
till Rome chapter 9 of apostle Paul, which has constituted  "sinner women"  firmly in 
Christian world until now, admired and observed even by learned intellects in very 
well developed western countries.
This groundless Biblical constitution of ruthless sexism has to be demolished 
thoroughly in our generation whose chains have been barring half of human 
population for millennia.

Half of human population are suffering from this groundless Biblical superstition 
directly or non directly in all Christian countries and the countries of similar kind of 
Near eastern religion.
It is unlawful to discriminate woman's equal right based on sexism only in very 
small number of well developed countries (although a good many conservative
Christians even there still keep doing), while many others take it for granted to 
justify cruel treatment of women.   

The Brooklyn-based Orthodox Jewish Hasidic newspaper, 
Der Zeitung, apologizes for Hillary Clinton deletion

"Clinton and Director for Counterterrorism Audrey Tomason 
were both airbrushed out of the photo because the newspaper's 
policy is not to publish any images of women in case they could 
be considered sexually suggestive."  "More critical observers 
suggest the women have been edited, because of an ideological 
objection to women holding positions of power."

Der Zeitung said it has a "long standing editorial policy" of not 
publishing women's images. It explained that its readers "believe 
that women should be appreciated for who they are and what 
they do, not for what they look like, and the Jewish laws of modesty 
are an expression of respect for women, not the opposite".

¡°In accord with our religious beliefs, we do not publish photos of 
women, which in no way relegates them to a lower status... 
All Government employees are sworn into office, promising 
adherence to the Constitution, and our Constitution attests to our 
greatness as a nation that is a light beacon to the entire world. 
The First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees freedom of 
religion.   That has precedence even to our cherished freedom 
of the press! ¡¦   Because of laws of modesty, we are not allowed 
to publish pictures of women, and we regret if this gives an 
impression of disparaging to women, which is certainly never our
intention. We apologize if this was seen as offensive.¡±

   God  Bless   WOMAN  POWER  and  FREEDOM  !

"Zionism," strong nationalism of blood relativity in a tiny country "Israel."

We doubt if the Hebrew language has been able to survive two millennia 
unless the Jew was written as the stem host race of the Christianity, which 
must have provided the Jews with the definite pride of being selected 
people of God, as much as many gentile Christians must have been 
envious of to a certain extent.

It could be the ONE main background that has stimulated all the Jews around 
the world be proud of keeping their culture from generation to generation 
getting together tightly.
Jews have been able to see Christian churches and Christian countries anytime 
and anywhere they live whom are the reflecting mirrors of their pride and 
culture as the people of God.

Jewish rabbis and Christian scholars also must have continued the relationship 
of mutual help in preserving not only the text, but also the Hebrew grammar 
and pronunciation.
Christianity has been the stable and emotional guardian of Jews and Judaism 
without noticing he really does the job, eventually enabled them to unite back 
to the homeland and put a flag on again.

Thanks to the scholarly accomplishments of many wonderful theologians, we 
do not see any specific cultural mystery and any secret reason of special 
blessings to the Jews only.
We do believe that we all Christians have to get together and demolish the 
obstacles and explosive mines that will trigger the racial and international 
conflicts, which are the enemies of true Christianity.

"Zionism," strong nationalism of blood relativity in a very tiny country like Israel.

The strong nationalism of blood relativity is inevitable and essential when the 
rulers run the regime of a tiny country like Israel of the size slightly bigger than 
Florida state.
The relationship of blood relativity is stronger when the size of a country gets smaller.

The strength and solidity of Zionism could be compared to the strength and 
solidity of commercial Syndicate or Trust like profit coalition.
The Judeans had occupied and taken advantage of geographical situation of 
Israel which is in the intersection of the East, the West, Africa and Europe, which 
had produced them with abundant trade profits under the condition of well fruitful 
weather and nice farming ground condition which is "a land flowing with milk 
and honey." (Exodus 3:8) (at least after Priestly regime).

They had to learn and study more and solidify themselves with strong 
nationalism in order to keep the profit of "a small size nation of strong gene 
relationship," whom were surrounded by big bully countries.

Education must had been a self-defense weapon like survival tool to defend 
their lives when they had to travel far and settle down in different foreign countries.

Magnetic forces of a mysterious "people of God" and well educated 
commercial technicians could have built up "the attractiveness" which 
beckoned many 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, and even 1/32, 1/64 like barely Jewish descendants 
to the sides of densely profitable Jewish congregations.

What a warmonger U.S. national security adviser John Bolton is, whom has 
only 1/8 Jewish blood, but as cruel and furious as whom could be compared 
with Joshua.
John Bolton is on the forefront of American nationalism with the vandalism 
like slogan of "your blood is our food."

American Republicans threw away the peace treaty of six parties in 2001, 
asking for continuous painful sufferings of thirty millions of North Korean people 
and warlike tension of Korean Peninsula, which requires and justifies firm and 
permanent deploy of the U.S. military in the most strategic region in the world 
with even collecting expense from Korea.
Even after total disposal of nuclear weapons of DPRK, it is quite possible that 
America shall try to make up other reasons to turn down peace treaty i.e. trifle 
civil right issues etc. etc. 
in order to continue American imperialism.    www.AmericanVandalism.com

Definite supremacy of father YHWH's ethics over son Jesus'.

Holy, but malicious Christian wisdom which blocks "the reason and conscience."
 
"Believe, or do not believe the Bible as the firm truth." does MATTER very much  
to the human world in many respects, which most lay people easily skip to notice.
 
Many Christian elites whom believe the Bible as the firm truth have taken advantage
of their favorite verses, imitating Bible heroes, and committed many bold and grave
social crimes with no hesitation, not even a gram of guilty conscience at all.
(Bible heroes, selected elites of Jehovah whom are usually the sponsor group
of the Bible, or the writers themselves are free from the common moral criteria of
social Justice, on the contrary, they built up their own odd and weird moral criteria.)
 
The model heroes whom have been popularly copied are the first king of Israel,
David whom served his earlier life as a mercenary of the opponent country of Israel,
and his son Solomon between David and the wife of his subordinate, whom had
been changed his identity to Suleiman in another man made religion "Islam."
King Solomon might be one of the champions in human history whom grabbed the
wealth as much as he could by taking advantage of the low class people, which
had given a honorable nickname of "the king of wisdom" in Judaism.
 
"My father made your yoke heavy, but I will add to your yoke; my father disciplined
you with whips, but I will discipline you with scorpions."  (1 Kings 12:14)
 
And cruel king Jehu whom was a ruthless slaughterer, but a faithful model
executor in the time of inquisition and Catholic imperialism.
 
6 Then Jehu wrote them a second letter, saying, "If you are on my side, and if you
are ready to obey me, take the heads of your master's sons and come to me at Jezreel
tomorrow at this time." Now the king's sons, seventy persons, were with the leaders
of the city, who were charged with their upbringing. 7 When the letter reached them,
they took the king's sons and killed them, seventy persons; they put their heads in
baskets and sent them to him at Jezreel. 8 When the messenger came and told him,
"They have brought the heads of the king's sons," he said, "Lay them in two heaps
at the entrance of the gate until the morning."   (2 Kings 10:6-8)
Jehu said, "Take them alive." They took them alive, and slaughtered them at the pit
of Beth-eked, forty-two in all; he spared none of them.  (2 Kings 10:14)
 
Tale of Jacob and Esau in Hebrew Bible "Old Testament" was made up for the
purpose of justifying the kingship of king David and king Solomon, whom were
rare kind of kings, enthroned themselves in the country of ancient Near East,
where only the eldest sons were eligible to get the patriarchs or the kings.
Jacob deceived his father Issac very dramatically, and took the blessing of the
eldest son of Israel patriarchs, which justified the unqualified and exceptional
kingship of king David and king Solomon.  (Genesis chapter 25, 27)
 
"Success of deception" for the purpose of opportunistic victories could be counted
and admired as secret wonderful performance of the elites in the western Christian
world and Jewish community, as "the holy techniques of dirty crimes," which have
been supported by their absolute text "the Bible."

It is the logical truth of the Bible, that all the sweet Christian charities and admirable
salvation of Jesus, and even his passion had been enabled after or through the
success of grisly and weird crimes and hypocrisies of his ancestors (at least in
textual order) like two different faces of Janus.
Such a plain truth of technically made up Bible has been really a blue ocean to
many clever and opportunistic elites and upstarts to take advantage in western world.
 
Take any verse you like, which supports and justifies your desires in God's name.
Winners take everything with no wasteful mercy to the losers and poor neighbors,  
since this "survival of the fittest," "rule of the winners" is the RULE of God Jehovah.
We are doomed to rule and be prosper, and they are doomed to be ruled and exploited.
 
Has the potter (Jehovah) no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump on
object for special use and another for ordinary use?      (Rome 9:21)
 
Doesn't it mean that all humans other than "selected people of God" are only brittle
and disposable cookie pots, although what apostle Paul meant is a little different ?
 
It is the framework of the Bible, that selected people of God are doomed to take
advantage and rule over, while the others are doomed to be exploited and consumed
by the needs of people of God, and their elites.
Surely, all European countries set up their own Imperialism based upon each of
their own favorite Bible verses, and declared "we are doomed to rule over and take
advantage, while they are doomed to be ruled and exploited.
 
The rich rule over the poor, and the borrower is the slave of the lender. (Proverbs 22:7)  
 
Money, money, money is the first, which rules the world !
   
Selected people of God should not fear anything in observing the grisly RULE of God,
which is written and totally guaranteed by Jehovah.
 
1 The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want. 2 He makes me lie down in green
pastures; he leads me beside still waters; 3 he restores my soul. He leads me in
right paths for his name's sake. 4 Even though I walk through the darkest valley,
I fear no evil; for you are with me; your rod and your staff- they comfort me.  (Psalm 23)
  
Adultery is a gift of God, not a sin, which encourages Christian elites and priests.
 
7 Nathan said to David, 'You are the man! Thus says the Yahweh, the God of
Israel: I anointed you king over Israel, and I rescued you from the hand of Saul;
8 I gave you your master's house, and your master's wives into your bosom, and
gave you the house of Israel and of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would
have added as much more.  (2 Samuel 12:7-8)  
 
 
What a lottery monopoly God, Jehovah is !  Jehovah is really the jackpot pond !
 
2 all these blessings shall come upon you and overtake you, if you obey the Lord
your God: 3 Blessed shall you be in the city, and blessed shall you be in the field.
4 Blessed shall be the fruit of your womb, the fruit of your ground, and the fruit of
your livestock, both the increase of your cattle and the issue of your flock.
5 Blessed shall be your basket and your kneading bowl. 6 Blessed shall you be
when you come in, and blessed shall you be when you go out. 7 The Lord will cause
your enemies who rise against you to be defeated before you; they shall come
out against you one way, and flee before you seven ways. 8 The Lord will command
the blessing upon you in your barns, and in all that you undertake; he will bless you
in the land that the Lord your God is giving you. 9 The Lord will establish you as his
holy people, as he has sworn to you, if you keep the commandments of the Lord your
God and walk in his ways. 10 All the peoples of the earth shall see that you are called
by the name of the Lord, and they shall be afraid of you.
11 The Lord will make you abound in prosperity, in the fruit of your womb, in the fruit
of your livestock, and in the fruit of your ground in the land that the Lord swore to your
ancestors to give you.  (Deuteronomy 28 :2-11)
 
 
Why and how Bible has been forged and fabricated for the needs of the elites ?
 
The reasons of Bible redaction are, the first, disciples of Jesus were not courageous
and independent enough to write only what had happened and been taught by Jesus,
under furious circumstance of killing remained followers of Jesus in Judea.
Disciples and the Bible writers were not only courageous enough to write the truth,
but also were not independent and creative enough to believe in Jesus as a totally
independent and different setting, far apart from their customary and absolute religion
"Judaism."
Even the best one, apostle Paul, had built up theology of the palace of prince Jesus
in the castle of God Jehovah at best, which has been dominating the western world.
 
The second reason is, that they had to pop up many friendly signs to their compatriots
Judeans as much as they could in the Bible, in order to keep the lives of them and
their families safe with the attachment, "we are the same race, aren't we ?"
Making up Jesus as the faithful heir of Judaism was the sole and desperate exodus
canal they could make under such dangerous situation being surrounded by many
hostile Judeans, whom were trying to wife off all remained Christians in Judea.
 
 Mankind has been used to prefer bizarre insanity to "reason and conscience,"
in living with observing religious tradition and habits.
  
The outcomes of roughly forged Bible are awfully ugly and terrible, enough to have
paralyzed the human common senses of "reason and conscience" for two full millennia,
which means the deadly enclosed human society with crime encouraging text, which
has supported and justified the violence and crimes of brutal and opportunistic elites.
Opportunistic profits and powers of majority Christian elites have been all the time
superior to the humble charity of Jesus and priceless devotions of the minority in
the western world in general.
 
The old Testament has a lot more authorities than the new Testament to old Christians,
simply because the Old Testament is the text of the father of Jesus, whom made and
gifted his beloved son for the sake of salvation in textual theory.
 
 Frankly speaking, the core teaching of the world's biggest religion "Christianity" has
almost nothing to do with human happiness and well-beings inside its logic, on the
contrary, it is the main core obstacle wall which disturbs and blocks the natural sober
human mind and its progress of "the reason and the conscience."
Christianity has required almost everything to mankind for the expense of reward
of "eternal life," whose amount has been too much lavish to afford by the mankind.
 
Not only most lay Christians, but also a good many theologians and clergies could
not answer straight to the question of whether Christianity is a righteous and honest
religion, or a bad and lying religion in the criteria of scientific and objective value.
It seems that the secret philosophy of the Bible to many Christians with earthly desires,
and the most admirable charity of holy salvation of Jesus requires the process of
cheating, deceiving, and massacre as "prerequisites" as is written in the text Israel
nationalism which is the Old Testament.
 
Quite many of grave crimes and catastrophic loss to innocent people have started
and progressed by the group of frantic Christian elites, whom got used to justifying
the deceptions, crimes and adulteries by quotation of the Bible wisdom, which is
strong enough to paralyze the order of human world of "reason and conscience."
Their behaviors of committing crimes are bold and even authoritative with the faith
of that "selected people of God" can do anything without fear and guilty conscience.
They have paid a good amount of money in their lives to their churches faithfully,
good enough bribery to their subjective God Jehovah, which they believe good
enough to forgive anything bad and malicious they committed.
  

"Merchant of Venice," and merciless pawnbroker widow in "Crime and punishment" by
Dostoevsky are pupils of good academic standing in opportunistic conservative Christianity.
They carried out teachings and cleverness of the Old Testament of Judaism and
Christianity very faithfully, which has been ruling over the world for two full millennia.
  
 
Bible is the text of training and molding demons, and polluting "the social Justice."
  
Mankind has been very much accustomed to run over very common senses of the
judgement, "conscience and reason," which results in the habitual disorder of the world.
I. Kant said in his "practical reason" that conscience is the highest value judgement
in or out of the cosmos, which is agreed by most philosophers, not only as the
core body of the truth, the good, and beauty, but also as the basic agreement of
the utilitarianism.
 
The eternal peace treaty of the global utilitarianism of maximum happiness and well
-being of the maximum number of people is never something could be accepted by
"the selected people of God," whom have taken advantage of the holy privilege in
their entire lives with their forefathers.
Christians and Judaists push forward "the fabricated Bible" as the absolute truth.
  
There is no single moment allowed in the cosmos which runs against the "reason."
Conscience assembles everything in order, and has progressed the spiritual world
forward, not backward, and bears the best fruits of outcomes, which is the
advancement of the human achievements and utility, which assures all humans
of maximizing happiness and well-being, in another words "utilitarianism."
 
The most terrible violators to these wonderful virtues "reason and conscience" are
very clearly the religions of Christianity, Islam, Judaism, and Buddhism which are
the lifetime teachers of all mankind.
Running over the common senses of "reason and conscience" which is the most
critical crime in the human society, is a quite common and customary violence
of Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, and Hinduism, etc. etc.
 
Most humans have grown up under the circumstance of believing that "religion" is
something only to choose to believe or not choose to believe, which is followed
by "the total submission."
Discussing which part is good and right, and which part is wrong and bad, are never
the issues and the customs of religion whose best virtue is the "total submission"
all the time.
 
Obedience has been counted as the number one virtue in religion.
Once you obey Jehovah, eternal life of salvation of son Jesus is free gift bonus !
 
"Surely, to obey is better than sacrifice."  (1 Samuel 15:22)
 
The Lord your God you shall follow, him alone you shall fear, his commandments you
shall keep, his voice you shall obey, him you shall serve, and to him you shall hold fast.  
                                                    (Deuteronomy 13:4)
 
 
Abraham has been admired as the father of faith and father of all nations for two millennia,
only because this fictional character appears in man made text of Judaism and Christianity.
 

Jepthah sacrificed (burned) his daughter as he vowed to a very bizarre God Jehovah.
 
 
 
 The primary ethics of Judean Bible, Old Testament, is "the innocent people have to be
subordinate to holy scriptures and holy priests." which had made high priest families
at Jesus' time the richest elites.
This ridiculous tradition of ancient Judean religion has been transcended to the New
Testament of Christianity, which has paralyzed the righteous social order of "conscience
and reason" of mankind for two full millennia.     
 
However, it not surprising when ancient society is full of fatherless children, and widows
whom had to depend upon the temple, whom are the outcomes of ceaseless wars,
severe labor, poverty, and shortage of food and medical facility.
Temple might have taken the roles of a half-government, half-legislature, half-judiciary,
and multi-purpose charity organization in ancient times.  
 

Korea is "a mad Christian nation,"

which keeps vivid evidence of all these bad things.
Most Korean Christians believe firmly that they are the most faithful Christian nation with
mammoth Churches and frantic Christians.
They seem to practise "the logic of the conservative Christianity" more than any other
nations, which is "the ceaseless violence and crimes of the selected people of God."
 
 
Let me introduce two famous elite Christians whose backgrounds and careers of
Christian faith are never shorter than anybody in the world, and whose deceiving
skills and scales are never weaker than anybody in the world either.
They started Christian faiths from when they were growing in their mother's womb.
Their mother put her hand on the brow of each three sons every early in the morning
from when they were little boys for years, praying for the blessing of Jehovah more
earnestly than anyone.
 

 
President Myong-Bak Lee,    
and his brother Sang-Deuk Lee    Their "Hope church" is famous for many elite church members.
 
Their mother never skipped a single day of her prayer habit of attending on dawn prayer,
which has made her famous for the most ardent faithful mother, whom raised all three
sons to be rich and famous elites in still developing country, south Korea.
 
Myong-Bak Lee requested Samsung to pay four million dollars for the expense of attorneys
in his personal lawsuit in the U.S. to keep the money of his own company, which had been
announced by special prosecutor Ho-Young Chung as the belonging of an American citizen
Christopher Kim whom had been jailed full eight years as the sole criminal of stock
manipulation of Myong-Bak Lee's company.
Both Myong-Bak Lee and Samsung have been prosecuted for "bribery" nine years after
the incident, which was enabled by mass demonstration of Korean people on the street.
 
He had worked for Hyundai for decades, in which he could steal secret information of company
investment that he took advantage in building up enormous fortune of a quarter billion dollars.
He had poured money into sweeping lands nearby Hyundai's future investment, which gave him
several times of easy profits after Hyundai completed building up new industry projects.
Myong-Bak Lee and his brother Sang-Deuk Lee are involved in huge amount of embezzlement
events, made huge national loss and damage of south Korea more than any other single regime.
 
Sun-hee Kwak is listed as the elder Pastor of Hope Presbyterian church in their web www.somang.net  .
Sun-hee Kwak had been the Pastor for decades and one of founders of "Hope church," which has
been famous for many of elite church members in the nation due to the location in one of the richest
neighborhood of Korea.
 
Former President of Korea, Myong-Bak Lee, his brother Sang-Deuk Lee, and church chum Man-Soo
Kang are the ones out of many rich and famous elite church members whom are businessmen,
politicians, lawyers and college professors, etc. etc.
 
 

 
Sun-hee Kwak is blamed for supporting multi-million dollars without having any permission from
the church assembly to the church of his son, whom was troubled with private issue while he was an
assistant pastor of the Hope church.    Junior Kwak is introduced as a part time professor at Yonsei
theological seminary which is the biggest one in Korea  ysugst.yonsei.ac.kr  .
Rev. Sun-Hee Kwak was reported keeping adultery relationship with many woman church members.
Kwak had been the principle of Presbyterian theological seminary for years www.pcts.ac.kr  which is
the one reason why Korean theological seminaries under the power and money of certain denomination
unit are not free from the chain like faith of conservative old pastors whom firmly believe in that Bible is
the perfect words of God with no single error.
 

 
 Chief Justice, Seung-Tae Yang and his lieutenant General Lim.
                                    Bong-Hyun Kim     Rev. Man-Hee Lee of the New paradise church   
 
The former chief Justice of Korea, Seung-Tae Yang, and his lieutenant general Jong-Hun Lim
are surely the famous high class Christian lawyers.   
Both of them had been imprisoned for the crime of "trial manipulation."    
 
Chief Justice Yang did not skip to attend the church service even when he escaped himself.
 
 
Bong-Hyun Kim whom was arrested being in charge of cheating and robbing around one billion
dollars of innocent civilians, had been attending worship service three times a week with never
skipping single time.
For sure, no matter they are learned lawyers or street dodgers, a good majority of Korean Christians
believe, that Christians could do anything and be safe with magic power of almighty Jehovah.
 
Shadowy Church Is at Center of Corona virus Outbreak in South Korea.
As the country's infection numbers soar, most cases have been connected to
the Shincheonji Church of Jesus, which mainstream churches consider a cult.
(Shincheonji means "New paradise" in English, whose leader has been advertised as the new Messiah.)
At meetings of the secretive Shincheonji Church of Jesus, worshipers sit packed together on the floor,
forbidden to wear glasses - or face masks.
They come to church even when sick. After services, they split up into groups for Bible study,
or to go out into the streets and proselytize.
 

 
Byeong-Uhn Yoo is the ship owner of SeWol Ferry which sank down with three hundreds
of teenagers, whom is one of the famous pseudo Christianity leaders in Korea.
He was a quite famous Christian elite whom invited many foreign ambassadors to his private
shows and parties including former American ambassador, Sung Young Kim.
Yoo had kept on campaigning to have people believe in him as another Jesus Christ.
Yoo had held a photography one man show in Louvre, and Versailles in Paris which were
enabled by his large amount of tribute to them as one Maecenas.
 

Rev. Chang whom was one of co-chairs of Korean Christian council slipped off veranda rail of
apartment in which he was suspected committing adultery with one female church member,
when her husband noticed that the pastor was with his wife, and barged in there.
Rev. Chang was hiding himself and dangling with holding the veranda rail for ten minutes, but
finally exhausted and fell down on the ground and died without having help of almighty Jehovah.
Their church announced that Rev. Chang went to the heaven after excessive amount of labor
tribute to their church.  Hallelujah !
(The picture above has a little different story from that of Rev. Chang though.)
 Yoido Pentecostal church  of  Rev. Yong-Kee Cho is the biggest church in mankind history.
 
The secret of their success lies in that they are very much emotionally emphasized and hot tempered,
which was mighty tools to supply Koreans with mental peace whom have been hurt by many catastrophic
incidents including Korean War, and many social instabilities made by dictators, and many evil elites.
 
It is one secret history behind the rapid growth of super churches that the regime of the former dictator
supported the big churches when their tyranny kept being protested by Christians of many local churches.
The regime of dictator Chung-Hee Park, whose daughter is in jail now with the sentence of twenty years of
imprisonment, gave lavish amount of support to them i.e. free land.
It is very likely that the regime had supported the pastors of earthly interest, and tamed them well, and ask
"not to slander the regime and their tyranny."
 
 

 
Rev. Cho's pentecostal church built up an university, and his wife has become the President whom
is eight years old granny and quite notorious for her real estate speculation.
Students whom opposed the inauguration of her were violently stopped by their necks being held.
Cho's wife Sung-Hye Kim is in charge of embezzling multi million dollars of the church money as well.
One soprano singer in far right published a book revealing secret romance of Rev. Cho and her in Paris.
 
Three world's biggest Methodist churches of three brother pastors are succeeded to their sons.
 
 

 
Three children of one pastor father have grown up odd and extraordinary pastors in three big churches,
have been called "three super brothers."    All threes of Sun-Do Kim, Hong-Do Kim, and Kuk-Do Kim had
been elected alternately to the supervisor General of Korean Methodist churches whom have the power
of running the Methodist theological seminary as well  www.mtu.ac.kr  .
Who can stop criminal pastor Hong-Do Kim whom is the builder of the world's biggest Methodist church ?
All threes have succeeded in father to son succession of their churches very successfully.  Hallelujah ~ !
 
Rev. Hong-Do Kim's replying interview to whom criticized him and Keum-Ran church is more surprising.
 
Hong-Do Kim asserted very firmly    www.dangdangnews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=5337
1, There is no church which is free from earthly legal principles in Korea.
2, I have endured criticism with faith, otherwise, I must have killed some of opponents whom criticized me.
3, Bribery in election campaign of supervisor General of Methodist churches is not a crime but a custom.
4, Troubles of adultery and money embezzling are much worse in Catholic churches and Buddhist temples.
5, Liberal theology is the weapons of Satan and devil spirit which denies the true Christian faith and Bible.
 
Myung-Sung Presbyterian church of Rev. Sam-whan Kim was in charge of raising slush fund sum of
seventy million dollars, which enforced one elder whom was involved to commit suicide.
 
 

 
 Rev. Kwang-Hoon Chun whom is the present chief of the Christian Council
 of Korea is becoming more and more notorious for his bizarre talks and actions.
 
 "We shall make the perfect Christian country if we put the Buddhists in the jail,
 and deport all Buddhist monks to desert islands with supplying bare foods."
 
 "It will be very simple to make Korea 'Christian nation' only if Korean people elect
 we kind of real Christian workers and occupy the Congress."
 
 "Were you woman Christians be undressed before me, you are truly my religious
  fellows.   Otherwise, you are not mine."
 
                               "Let's pull out the President of country, that bastard Jae-In Moon."
 
       How can pastors be that prosperous with quite abundant of money to embezzle or misuse ?
       Why are so many Koreans that passionate for those kind of heroic and odd bizarre pastors ?
        Isn't it because their plain ration and personalities have been hurt and deprived by most
        aggressive elites too much to be handled by common ration ?
 
 
 
Mad demonstration crowds of frantic Christians gathered under the leadership of Rev. Chun
in August 2020, which eventually spread quite many of corona virus infection rapidly in a time.
 
 
  

What a mad and bizarre Christian nation, Korea is !

What about your country ?    Are you better than Korea, or worse ?

Ordinary and clever Christians do not observe the teachings of Jesus' charity and 
devotion, while they fall for superior grade ethics of YHWH which are individual 
richness, and holy opportunism of some ones like Jacob whom stole the blessing 
right of his elder brother Esau, and holy adultery gifts of YHWH to the elite believers 
in 2 Samuel 12:7-8.
Observing the words of father YHWH is a lot more authoritative and lucrative than 
observing the words of inferior son Jesus whose main ethics are  social justice, 
global cooperation, innocent self-devotion while father YHWH's is for the practical 
life, monetary profits, and physical pleasure.

Only the fools and novices prefer Jesus to YHWH, whom have never known the  
comparable benefits of Yahwism and have never been lured by its theological  
superiority and clever performance.  Even when innocent Christians love Jesus and try to
observe and practice the words of Jesus, Jesus in the Gospels has been too much 
badly redacted and hard to show off the real figure and identity.
How many of local pastors and bishops could identify the true figure of Jesus, not 
as the puppet of revised Judaism, when it is not easy to see definite Christian 
leaders even in noted theological institutes ?

Neutralized and deformed Christianity cannot interfere the flood of ignorant, wild 
and violent thoughts, and bizarre capitalism which keeps on polluting air and nature
which was initiated by Jewish German Max Weber whose main ideas are based 
upon very shallow understanding of the Bible which close to their Judaism.
Weber suggested to fill up the needs of social welfare with volitional church charity, 
which must have most civilians with needs starve for the definite shortages.

Capital conglomerates and ruling elites have power which is big enough to buy the 
lawyers, and paralyzed the judicial power in still developing country like south Korea 
www.watchcrime.com . They could buy not only broadcasting companies and 
newspapers which could lead the people of their countries to their sides, but also 
politicians and government officers of the U.S. alike.

Theological disorder and helplessness are placed in the center of all international 
troubles i.e. wars, racial conflicts, class conflicts, sexism, violence of unsocial and 
bizarre superstition.   Most Christians have believed that the New Testament has 
been written and completed as well as what the Old Testament has prophesied, while 
New Testament was made up to fill up the wishes and schemes of the Old Testament,
which is only the text of priests elites of one very tiny near eastern country "Israel."
Christianity has to be restored to its historical and unpolluted "truthfulness" which has
almost nothing to do with Judaism and many local superstitions which have been 
polluted and made up and inflated for millennia.

Theological institutes are ought to supply good amount of accurate information, and
show the clear direction to whom have been suffering from the shortage of Bible
knowledge, and committing habitual and customary social violence and crime.
They are politicians, ruling elites, government officers, clergies, news reporters, and 

Michael Sandel, world famous Prof. of philosophy and politics, published "Justice," 
and Michael Drosnin, American journalist published "Bible code."
Can Michael Sandel dare justify what the justice is without having the basic  
understanding of the good and bad of the Bible ?
What a bizarre kind very evil publication "Bible code" is which just bubbles and 
bubbles a text of one ridiculous folk religion !

Only the true theologians can say what the justice is and what the truth of Bible is.
What the global justice is to be, and how the mankind should work together have
to be declared in detail by today's modest theologians all the time.
Otherwise, the world has no other option than wandering and rushing to the dead
end road very blindly.  
All social troubles and crimes, and the global catastrophes which come from the 
distorted perspective of disorder of Christian ethics shall be repaired easily, if the
Jesus has his right portion in the text, recovering back to the independent God.
What a clear and easy text Bible is supposed to be if we clean up all ridiculous
redaction parts which are not only awefully lengthy, but also very difficult and bizarre.
World shall be much finer and righteous, and all humankind shall be much happier.

"Whoever wants to be first must be last of all and servant of all."   (Mark 9:36) 
"It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for some who is 
rich to enter the kingdom of God."  (Mark 10:25)
"The Sabbath (law & rule) was made for mankind, and not humans for the 
Sabbath. So the Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath."  (Mark 2:27.8)
"You lack one thing; go, sell what you own, and give the money to the poor, and 
you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me."  (Mark 10)
There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or 
houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the 
apostles¡¯ feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.  (Acts 4:34,35)

Phrases of  avarice ethics of Judaism are incomparably much more than honest poverty 
of New Testament, whose amount and value of individual richness are quite good enough to 
overwhelm, surpass, and ignore the words of Jesus whom is just a poor subordinate
son of YHWH of Judaism.

Job 42:12   Yahweh  blessed the latter days of Job more than his beginning; and he had fourteen 
thousand sheep, six thousand camels, a thousand yoke of oxen, and a thousand donkeys.
Psalm 112:3 Wealth and riches are in their houses, and their righteousness endures forever.
1Kings 3:13   I give you also what you have not asked, both riches and honor all your life.
Deuteronomy  28:2  All these blessings shall come upon you and overtake you, if you obey Yahweh your God.
Proverbs 8:18 Riches and honor are with me, enduring wealth and prosperity. 19 My fruit is better 
than gold, even fine gold, and my yield than choice silver. 20 I walk in the way of righteousness, 
along the paths of justice, 21 endowing with wealth those who love me, and filling their treasuries.
               10:22 The blessing of the Lord makes rich, and he adds no sorrow with it.

YHWH of Judaism has to be the chair or the captain of Trinity since holy son and holy ghost 
are only the offsprings of YHWH the creator, which culminated in subordination of Jesus to YHWH 
firmly with no dare objection, finalized into "subordinationism," which commenced the Dark Ages.

What is Jehovah (or Yahweh) ?

G Ernest Wright (father of Biblical Archaeology) studied with W F Albright at John's Hopkins University where he received M.A. degree and PhD. in 1936 and 1937. He taught Old Testament History and Theology at McCormickseminary from 1939-1958.   He joined the faculty of Harvard Divinity School in 1958 in which he wasParkman Professor and the Curator of the SemiticMuseum (beginning in 1961) until he died in 1974.

"Hebrew" comes from "Apiru" which means "the lawless."It has the same linguistic base that "Bar-bar-ian" comes from "bar-bar-murmuring savages" which was named by Latins.

  "Early Israel" by Robert B. Coote of S. F. Theological Seminary.

Global Liberation of Jesus' truth is imminent, coming NOW !

What really have terrified humankind very much painfully and steadily for millennia ironically 
came from the holy Bible, which have required absolute submission of brutal Racism and 
Nationalism, blind Sexism, shameless Capitalism of survival of the fittest.
Bible asks such terrible bad things in return for salvation of Jesus and the joy of eternal life, 
whose business doctrine has almost nothing to do with true Jesus.

However, it is awfully difficult to come to that understanding as Norman Gottwald once said 
that understanding Bible requires quite a long time of studying in the right path, which lay 
Christian cannot pay the price in his (or her) life time.

I do suggest an wonderful grand gift to humankind, which only we theologians are privileged 
to offer, not any politician or other area scholars can even dream of.
What a giant gracious gift project it shall be, if we unveil the groundless falseness of those.
1, Jesus is not the son of God, or son of Yahweh, which defines that Jesus never 
buttress any nationalism, and racism, and sexism alike such as Judaism.
2, Yahweh is a paper God which can be made up by any folk and local religion.

If we all theologians clarify and say in one voice, this shall give the mankind a lot bigger 
present than gifting a Rolls Royce to each individual human being.
Why don't we publish one fine guide book of Bible two millennia after the first publication
of institutional canons, which created all goodness and badness of the Christianity.

WE  CAN  DO  IT  IN  OUR  TIME,  RIGHT  NOW  !

  Sang Wook Lee, an U.S. citizen independent theologian.

  donation to : Kook Min Bank, account # 743201 04 058620

  swift code  CZNBKRSE,  south Korea

Are we all mean cowards and bad opportunists ready for the fall of the mankind like the judgement day of filthy Pompey.
Surely, the days are coming near.  I opened a new web-site celebrating the funeral party !

Possible origins of making of the Gospels

1 In the 3rd book of Ecclesiastical History written by early age church historian Eusebius, it is wrtitten as the quotation saying of Papias

(3.39.15) "¥ê¥á? ¥ó¥ï?¥è' ? ¥ð¥ñ¥å¥ò¥â?¥ó¥å¥ñ¥ï? ?¥ë¥å¥ã¥å¥í? ¥Ì?¥ñ¥ê¥ï? ¥ì?¥í ?¥ñ¥ì¥ç¥í¥å¥ô¥ó?? ¥Ð?¥ó¥ñ¥ï¥ô ¥ã¥å¥í?¥ì¥å¥í¥ï?, ?¥ò¥á ?¥ì¥í¥ç¥ì?¥í¥å¥ô¥ò¥å¥í, ?¥ê¥ñ¥é¥â?? ?¥ã¥ñ¥á¥÷¥å¥í, ¥ï? ¥ì?¥í¥ó¥ï¥é ¥ó?¥î¥å¥é ¥ó? ?¥ð? ¥ó¥ï? ¥ê¥ô¥ñ?¥ï¥ô ? ¥ë¥å¥ö¥è?¥í¥ó¥á ? ¥ð¥ñ¥á¥ö¥è?¥í¥ó¥á. ¥ï?¥ó¥å ¥ã?¥ñ ?¥ê¥ï¥ô¥ò¥å¥í ¥ó¥ï? ¥ê¥ô¥ñ?¥ï¥ô ¥ï?¥ó¥å ¥ð¥á¥ñ¥ç¥ê¥ï¥ë¥ï?¥è¥ç¥ò¥å¥í ¥á?¥ó?, ?¥ò¥ó¥å¥ñ¥ï¥í ¥ä?, ?? ?¥õ¥ç¥í, ¥Ð?¥ó¥ñ?? ?? ¥ð¥ñ?? ¥ó?? ¥ö¥ñ¥å?¥á? ?¥ð¥ï¥é¥å?¥ó¥ï ¥ó?? ¥ä¥é¥ä¥á¥ò¥ê¥á¥ë?¥á?, ?¥ë¥ë' ¥ï?¥ö ?¥ò¥ð¥å¥ñ ¥ò?¥í¥ó¥á¥î¥é¥í ¥ó?¥í ¥ê¥ô¥ñ¥é¥á¥ê?¥í ¥ð¥ï¥é¥ï?¥ì¥å¥í¥ï? ¥ë¥ï¥ã?¥ø¥í, ?¥ò¥ó¥å ¥ï?¥ä?¥í ?¥ì¥á¥ñ¥ó¥å¥í ¥Ì?¥ñ¥ê¥ï? ¥ï?¥ó¥ø? ?¥í¥é¥á ¥ã¥ñ?¥÷¥á? ?? ?¥ð¥å¥ì¥í¥ç¥ì?¥í¥å¥ô¥ò¥å¥í. ?¥í?? ¥ã?¥ñ ?¥ð¥ï¥é?¥ò¥á¥ó¥ï ¥ð¥ñ?¥í¥ï¥é¥á¥í, ¥ó¥ï? ¥ì¥ç¥ä?¥í ?¥í ?¥ê¥ï¥ô¥ò¥å¥í ¥ð¥á¥ñ¥á¥ë¥é¥ð¥å?¥í ? ¥÷¥å?¥ò¥á¥ò¥è¥á? ¥ó¥é ?¥í ¥á?¥ó¥ï??".
(3.39.16) ¥ó¥á?¥ó¥á ¥ì?¥í ¥ï?¥í ?¥ò¥ó?¥ñ¥ç¥ó¥á¥é ¥ó? ¥Ð¥á¥ð?? ¥ð¥å¥ñ? ¥ó¥ï? ¥Ì?¥ñ¥ê¥ï¥ô? ¥ð¥å¥ñ? ¥ä? ¥ó¥ï? ¥Ì¥á¥ó¥è¥á?¥ï¥ô ¥ó¥á?¥ó' ¥å?¥ñ¥ç¥ó¥á¥é? "¥Ì¥á¥ó¥è¥á?¥ï? ¥ì?¥í ¥ï?¥í ?¥â¥ñ¥á?¥ä¥é ¥ä¥é¥á¥ë?¥ê¥ó? ¥ó? ¥ë?¥ã¥é¥á ¥ò¥ô¥í¥å¥ó?¥î¥á¥ó¥ï, ?¥ñ¥ì?¥í¥å¥ô¥ò¥å¥í ¥ä' ¥á?¥ó? ?? ?¥í ¥ä¥ô¥í¥á¥ó?? ?¥ê¥á¥ò¥ó¥ï?".

However, Papias (c 70-163) was born after Mark (-68) had died whose information could have stemmed from oral tradition of early church age which assembled from tales possibly inflated and exaggerated in plain piety.  Such pieous history transcended and observed habitually from theirelders and forefathers usuallly lacks of accurate historicity and rationality which could be compared with street tradition stating like "Romeo and Julieset" is a written autobiography of Romeo and Juliet.

2 Paul whom had never met Jesus in flesh could be counted as the first writer of biography of Jesus which eventually bears the first "seed Gospel."

Potatoes of Paul (original Gospel of Paul) are baked and served with butter only (Mark), or cream cheese (Quelle : "common" in German. Common parts of Matthew and Luke), or more colorful and artificial dressings (John and other street Gospels) !

Three major Gospels of Mark, Matthew, and Luke have same order of story telling, which names themselves Synoptics. (Syn=same, optic =see)

There were so many forgeries and street Gospels flooded on the market with fancy redactions and odd tales after the Gospel of Mark appeared for the first time, which reacted and helped the Good Gospels to favor to remain as "untouched originals" compared to "made-up cheap forgeries." However, it is very likely that even Good Gospels had to compete each others and needed to do some small patch jobs (redaction) for their own audience.

 Christian Bible has not been naturally written as well as being prophesized by the Jewish Hebrew Bible (Old Testament).
On the contrary, Christian Bible have tried their own best to pretend they are the consecutive prophesized parts of Hebrew Bible.

1, It has been human instinct to flatter the great person is the son of God, as well as Judeans call David and Romans call the emperors.

2, Most earyl Christians are traditional and typical Jews who had been toughly biased to anti-gentile grotesque Judaism, whom firmly  believed the closer relationship between Jesus and Yahweh could tribute to glorify Jesus more and more.

3, Most early Jewish Christians need to reconcile and keep friendly relationship with stubborn lay Jews who kept prosecuting and being aggressive and hostile with them.

4, The prime theolgian of early Christian congreation, Paul, set up the fine acceptible popular theology that Jesus is the son of Yahweh.

 Japanese American store owner in S.F. had to put the sign in front of the store in 1942 to assert that 110,000 of Japanese Americans do not help the aggression of Japan before they were ought to be deported and incarcerated in ten different camps during World War Two.
 In the same reason, Christians in the first century had to keep campaigning to prove that they are the same Jews to worship the same God Yahweh, and His beloved prince Jesus in order to STOP THE PROSECUTION.  Gospels had to be compriomised to paint Jesus as the son of God, not God himself, which absurdly has lasted for two full millenia and deluded the mankind making Christianity "superstition."
All righteous Christians in the world now have to declare loudly that     JESUS IS NOT THE SON OF YAHWEH !

Gospel of Mark had come out first, which was followed by Gospel of Mattew before long.
Luke cooked a formal reconcile supper for Theophillus like Sadducees who had been chronic bullies of Christians.

 Luke had to copy two main Gospels (Mark - Matthew) yet on the market in making a flattery Gospel for elite Saddcees like Theophilus.

What is the possible background of the birh of Luke when there have been Mark and Matthew yet on the market.

1, Luke's social standing as of a pysician is higher than that of Mark and Matthew whose social standing is presumably too low and mean to be dealt with the highest social standing group of Theophilus like Sadducee.
(This idea can explain why Luke had to copy and modify Mark and Matthew like pre-published edtions of Gospel in his name.
There might have been a social need to bridge Christianity with high priestly group of people like Sadduccee famiy whose head is Theophilus.)

2, Did physician Luke volunteer to introduce Jesus and Christianity to highest priestly Saducee group all of a sudden, or anythig like
persnal relationship between physicial Luke and Sducee group had been set up already to invite or motivate Luke to write the Gospel of
Luke and Acts ?
(Comparably highly social standing job of a physician of Luke could enable him to meet and pile up friendly realtionship with like Saducees,
or there might have been a possibility you can imagine that Luke has clients among Saduccees whom might have been attracted by
Christianity in many ways inlcuding magical physical healing power of Christianity.)

3, The job of physician at ancient time is not that of only scientific help but also of spiritual and magical help too, which could have fully
triggered Luke like physician theologian to create magical addtion in addition to the Gospels of Mark and Matthew.
(The love of making up personal imagination and insertion onto pre-published Gospels like Mark and Matthew was not a shame or
mis-behavior at ancient time but a brave and sincere piety which could be honored by most allegory lovers.

Conservative Christianity is a superstitution, unsocial clever opportunism, ridiculous paradigm of self-enjoyment which has to be banned by the law all over the world.

1, They could waive fastidious regulations and ristrictions of Jesus very easily and humbly favoring enjoyment of rich estate, adultery, brtual egotism, individualism, opportunism, and imperialism which have been fully granted by Jesus' holy father Yahweh.

Opportunism is the holy, lucrative, and enigmatic virtue of conservative Christianity that most Christians are yearning like super lottery.
(Genesis chapter 25 & chapterr 27)

Adultery, what the grace and gift of Yahweh to rich and filthy pastors whom believe they are as great as Bible heroes.  (2 Samuel 12:7-8)

Richness is the final goal of most Christians as the blessing of Yahweh, no matter how it has been warned by Jesus.  (Job 42:12)

1, Jesus is never the son of YHWH.  Jesus could be the real YHWH himself whom
     had saved the poorest people, not the YHWH racial and inflated by Israel and Jews.

Jesus is someone whom is never compatible with Judasm and its frantic followers i.e. sadducees and pharisees.

Dare straightly deny what licensed high priests of sadducees and phariesees teaching with the authority of law-enforcement.

35 While Jesus was teaching in the temple, he said, ¡®How can the scribes say that the Messiah is the son of David?
36 David himself, by the Holy Spirit, declared, ¡°The Lord said to my Lord, ¡®Sit at my right hand, until I put your enemies under your feet.¡¯ ¡± 37David himself calls him Lord; so how can he be his son?¡¯ And the large crowd was listening to him with delight.
(Mark 12:35-37, Matt 22:41-46, Luke 20:39-47)

Preaching what Jesus really teaches which is against to Judaism is as risky as these.
1, Preaching communism in front of the Pentagon or C.I.A.
2, Running a department store in Manhattan without having a merchant license.
3, Openning an Itanlian Maphia branch in Tokyo or Osaka where occupied by Yakuza.
4, Justifying or praising suicide bomber in Jerusalem.
5, Paying counterfeit bill to a starbuck's in the building of the Mint Bureau.

Desperate Popularization of true Christinity is practically inevitable and a matter of course after execution of Jesus.
1, Students and followers of Jesus are mostly Jews whom would like to accpet Jesus as the son of Yahweh not an outsider,
encouraged by great  street reputaion of miraculous Jesus.
2, They had to provide themselves with plenty of survival excuses to powerful and dreadful Sadducees and  pharisees.

When did Jesus start to call Yahweh Father or Daddy ?

Paul is the most possible first theologian whom heard and accepted street-repuation of Jesus being the son of God, and completed the
theology of that Jesus is the son of Yahweh.
The very first ones whom called Jesus "son of God" in Bible for the first time are very ironically unclean spirits (Mark 3:11), neither lay humans of the crowd nor disciples of Jesus.  
The patients whom experienced the magic healing power and received grace from Jesus called Jesus in gratitude are the second ones.
Street-repuation of Jesus "son of God" which had become bigger and bigger like a snowman could have encouraged disciples of Jesus to be
more and more  absorbed in their mission of following Messiah.

11Whenever the unclean spirits saw him, they fell down before him and shouted, ¡®You are the Son of God!¡¯
12But he sternly ordered them not to make him known.  (Mark chapter 3)
11 ¥ê¥á¥é ¥ó¥á ¥ð¥í¥å¥ô¥ì¥á¥ó¥á ¥ó¥á ¥á¥ê¥á¥è¥á¥ñ¥ó¥á ¥ï¥ó¥á¥í ¥á¥ô¥ó¥ï¥í ¥å¥è¥å¥ø¥ñ¥ï¥ô¥í ¥ð¥ñ¥ï¥ò¥å¥ð¥é¥ð¥ó¥ï¥í ¥á¥ô¥ó¥ø ¥ê¥á¥é ¥å¥ê¥ñ¥á¥æ¥ï¥í {VAR1: ¥ë¥å¥ã¥ï¥í¥ó¥á }
{VAR2: ¥ë¥å¥ã¥ï¥í¥ó¥å? } ¥ï¥ó¥é ¥ò¥ô ¥å¥é ¥ï ¥ô¥é¥ï? ¥ó¥ï¥ô ¥è¥å¥ï¥ô 12 ¥ê¥á¥é ¥ð¥ï¥ë¥ë¥á ¥å¥ð¥å¥ó¥é¥ì¥á ¥á¥ô¥ó¥ï¥é? ¥é¥í¥á ¥ì¥ç ¥á¥ô¥ó¥ï¥í ¥õ¥á¥í¥å¥ñ¥ï¥í ¥ð¥ï¥é¥ç¥ò¥ø¥ò¥é¥í

In the mean time, Peter might have replied that he never saw Jesus called Yahweh "father."

Paul needed to get the information of his new Lord Jesus as much as possible from Peter. Paul could have been very gentle and thankful to top desciple Peter in most cases whom accepted Paul as a new member of the community in spite of the different background.
However, the conversation could have turned into a dilemma frequently when Peter was quite reluctant to agree with Paul's that Jesus is the son of Yahweh.
Peter might have replied that "I never saw Lord Jesus called Yahweh 'father', and I cannot agree with you."
Paul must have tried to explain in more details showing and reading Hebrew scriptures as a proof of his faith.
It was not easy for Peter to accpt Paul's, however it is not necessary all the time to reject the projectof glorifying the Lord Jesus which means Peter had no reason and biblical knowledge to deny Paul's theology.
Paul could have finally but barely succeeded in persuading Peter to agree with Paul's theology of salvation based upon that Jesus is the son of God.   Peter might have appreciated Paul who has crowned Jesus the son of God, prince of Yahweh afterwards and dare not able to argue with Paul any more whose social standing is much higher than him like a master and a slave.
However, Peter might have been sometimes very unhappy and uncomfortable with Paul kind rare activist who was not even in their group practically trained by Jesus. Peter could have casted a suspicion occasionally on Paul who is not only the head of the opponent Gentile side, but also the charismatic dictator like scripture authoritatrian whom overwhelmed all others in Judean Christian community.
If Jesus indentified himself as the son of Yahweh as is written in the Gospels, he must have been called "insane" and had to be accused by both the temple priests and the phariees much earlier time.

A good many churches are occupied by Judas pirests, and Seminaries are occupied by mean and cheap street opportunists.

A good majority of christian scholars, seminary professors, and church pastors are weak and mean opportunists
who work for only their personal wealth and fames which is far out of Christian ethics.
How could you expect the Lord stay with these mean and cheap christians including you ?
This web-site has the foremost insight information and true Chrisian ethics, which deserves to lead the global justice.

Western theologians have spent lavishly tons of time and labor for two millennia, whose result is nothing but a country Israel.
What they have worked for the Justice of Jesus is quite little compared to what they have terrified exploited weak neighbors.
Old testament has to be cut off to use, and O.T. study has no longer its position in the Seminary other than history of Israel.
Seminary education should focus on carrying out Global Justice and Christian Socialism, which are the essence of Christianity.

Jesus has nothing to do with Israel & Judaism !   Jesus just chose to be born in the samllest country in the world with humility.

Jesus is not the son of Israel God Yahweh.   Jesus is the most possible God being !
The message of Jesus is a lot much simpler than what most western idiot scholars, profs, and christian clergies believe in.
It is the right time to set Jesus completely free from disgusting, arrogant, egotistic, racial discriminating western christian culture.
No more war !   No more racial conspiracy !   No more human hierarchism !   No more dirty and badly polluted politicians !

Have you heard any message of Justice from noted Seminaries and famous scholars other than bizarre theories lately ?
Berlin, Bologna, Cambridge, Chicago, Harvard, Munich, Oxford, Paris, Princeton, Sorbonne, Yale are shameless names.
Have you heard any good elite business man or politician working his right job for his wealth, or mostly street rascals ?
Have your heard any sober-minded and well-educated clergy and pastor in your nation, or mostly frantics or authoritarians ?

How rich opportunists not only survive, but also thrive as successful and blessed Christians
dare contrary to Mark 10:25 ?

The Judean Christian community in early beginning time must have been very much reluctant to accept the awesome grandeur
idea of very ambitious and aggressive apostle Paul that the late Jesus is the son of Yahweh.
However, we cannot conjecture there was any disciple dare object or hate the idea of Paul who is from mighty high class of pharisee
family whose diginity is as high as that of the master of all other disciples of Jesus, whom were mostly poor and mean fishermen or tax
collector survived barely as low class like slaves.

Moreover, they do not have any specific reason to hate to crown Jesus as the son of Yahweh as long as they could get along with Paul 
having satisfy themselves with right amount of reasons why.
It seems quite likely that Paul succeeded in having Peter understood and surrender, and kept his authoritative high position among them
since then as much as dare scolded the top disciple Peter.

It could help them to have the high pride that their Lord Jesus is the prince of Yahweh without knowing the follwoing dreadful mistake that
they committed to have their Lord Jesus a shadow subordinate of Yahweh.
Whenever conflicts sparked between Jesus and Yahweh, Yahweh and the old testament (Jewish Bible) remained winners while the prince
Jesus and new testament had to keep the secondary submissive position of a subordinate.
For sure, the Christianity worshiped for two full millennia is only the revised version of Judaism and not the real true Christianity.
Individual richness is a shame of true Christianity whose priority is on social richness and global happiness.